Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cooper-Standard Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$485kEducation$122kHealth$100kYouth Development$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kRecreation & Sports$8kScience & Tech$5kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$747
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Junior Achievement$15,000
Michigan Colleges Alliance$10,000
Breakthrough T1D$10,000
Michigan State University$5,000
Central Michigan University$3,000
Saginaw Valley State University$2,000
Grand Valley State University$2,000
East Tennessee State University$1,000
Perdue University Fort Wayne$1,000
Owens Community College$1,000
Alpena Community College$1,000
Oakland University$1,000
The Ohio State University$1,000
Northeast State Comm College$1,000
University of Olivet$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $490k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American National Red Cross: $10k → 14%See Attachment 1: $480k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
OR
IN
OH
CO
KY
MD
TN
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 16 repeat orgs$699k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
48

Total granted

$105k
$671k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+3%

Still filing today

19%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsScience & TechYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +92%
  • BW
    Baldwin Wallace University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $520k
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +18%
  • GC
    Gilda's Club
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
4
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Findlay; the most unlike its peers is Motor City Veterans Hockey Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $520,415 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGilda's Club: $25,000 · Other+56 more: $153,687 · Other+56 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $50,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 · HealthMichigan Colleges Alliance: $10,000 · EducationBaldwin Wallace University: $2,000 · EducationHOPE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,000 · EducationJohn Carroll University: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $1,000 · EducationThe University of Findlay: $1,000 · EducationDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationVanderbilt University: $1,000 · EducationINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesMotor City Veterans Hockey Association: $8,188 · Recreation & SportsHartland Robotics: $5,000 · Science & TechBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$699,102Health$60,000Education$23,000Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$8,188Science & Tech$5,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $15,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Colleges Alliance: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMotor City Veterans Hockey Association: $8,188 over 1y, 21% of budgetHartland Robotics: $5,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Christian University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Colleges Alliance ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Motor City Veterans Hockey Association ↗
  • Who funds Hartland Robotics ↗
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds John Carroll University ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Christian University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY ↗
  • Who funds The University of Findlay ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cooper-Standard Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cooper-Standard Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cooper-Standard Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cooper-Standard Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cooper-Standard’s filings →

More from the funding graph