· Public charity
Conservative Partnership Institute
The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) is dedicated to providing a platform for citizen leaders, the conservative movement, Members of Congress, congressional staff and scholars to be connected.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $384k
- $250k+5 grants · $8.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Foundation for Accountability Integrity & Research in Elections Fund | $6,042,000 |
| Personnel Policy Operations Inc | $1,075,000 |
| Hunter Nation Foundation Inc | $350,000 |
| Edmund Burke Foundation | $255,000 |
| State Leadership Foundation | $250,000 |
| Green Dragon Society | $200,000 |
| Conservative Partnership International Inc | $100,000 |
| American Moment Inc | $84,000 |
| America First Legal Foundation | $35,000 |
| American Accountability Foundation | $25,000 |
| Capitol Hill Christian Academy | $20,000 |
| Best in Ed Inc | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 100% of Conservative Partnership Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +176% since the first grant, against +65% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPersonnel Policy Operations Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +217% · 80% of their budget
- CFCenter for Renewing America Inc3× · 2021–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +553% · 56% of their budget
- AFAmerica First Legal Foundation4× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +401%
Funded once
- AVAmerican Voting Rights Foundationone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
- FMFDRLST MEDIA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $175k · revenue -19%
- ACAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $161k · revenue +131%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…
It is the mission of the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI) to provide education, research, analysis and recommendations to policy makers, opinion leaders and the American people designed to help solve public policy problems through…
To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.
Conduct research and training to guide conservatives through the digital transformation of politics and advocating for the increased adoption of digital communications technology by candidates and elected officials.
The organization engaged in public communications and issue education activities related to national security, the protection of life, and tax and spending issues.
Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.
To Conduct research and educate the public about various policy issues across the United States.
To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.
The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) is dedicated to providing a platform for citizen leaders, the conservative movement, Members of Congress, congressional staff and scholars to be connected. The Organization works to provide…
To educate the public regarding its proposal to implement a Nationwide Popular Vote Election of the President of the United States by providing objectively-determined information, data, analyses, and studies aimed at improving
The Common Sense Policy Institute works to inform the American public of dysfunction in the government by identifying government waste, fraud, and abuse through engaging in nonpartisan analysis, study, and research relating to government…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Accountability Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fdrlst Media Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 5 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 48% of your grantees by number, and just 66% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Foundation for Accountability Integrity & Research in Elections Fund ↗
- Who funds Personnel Policy Operations Inc ↗
- Who funds Center for Renewing America Inc ↗
- Who funds America First Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds State Freedom Caucus Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACCOUNTABILITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Election Integrity Action Inc ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds American Moment Inc ↗
- Who funds HUNTER NATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Edmund Burke Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds State Leadership Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREEN DRAGON SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FDRLST MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CITIZEN FOCUSED SERVICE ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN MAIN STREET INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CenterInstitute for legislative analysis inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Servant Foundation · The Dunn Foundation · The Rydin Foundation · The Randolph Foundation · The Leandro P Rizzuto Foundation · AEL Family Foundation Inc · The Heritage Foundation · Thomas D Klingenstein Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Triad Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Conservative Partnership Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.