Skip to content
Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc

The connecticut coalition against domestic violence, inc.

$21M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$100MHealth$22MCrime & Legal$14MHousing & Shelter$838kEducation$22k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $182k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
  • $250k+15 grants · $21M
$1,057,623
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BHCARE INC$2,503,547
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER INC$2,210,637
UNITED SERVICES INC$2,132,047
HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC$1,673,839
SAFE FUTURES INC$1,590,184
PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC$1,405,319
THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC$1,385,987
SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WATERBURY INC$1,331,904
THE NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC$1,099,516
THE CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT AND EDUCATION INC$1,090,044
SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC$1,057,623
MERIDEN-WALLINGFORD CHRYSALIS INC$968,627
MOSES WEITZMAN HEALTH SYSTEM INC$812,122
YMCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC$716,197
PROJECT SAGE INC$527,296
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137M · 22 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$137M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BHcare Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +23%
  • DV
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +53% · 64% of their budget
  • US
    UNITED SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +35%
  • AC
    ASNUNTUCK COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • CO
    CITY OF HARTFORD
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transition House Inc

Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…

—
2
Safe Voices

The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

—
3
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
4
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
5
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
6
New Hope Inc

New hope engages survivors, stakeholders and communities to build an anti-violence movement. using a trauma-informed practice, we work with those impacted by sexual and domestic violence, as well as those persons who use abuse in their…

Human Services
7
Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation

Mercy housing and shelter corporation provides housing assistance and supportive services to persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. mercy works to empower its clients to become independent, so they may live and work with…

Housing & Shelter
8
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
9
New Bedford Women's Center Inc

To empower and support positive choices for all and to educate and take action in the community for the prevention of oppression and violence.

—
10
New Directions Center Inc

To reduce the impact and occurrence of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and stalking by providing victim support services and raising community awareness.

Health
11
Center for Hope and Safety Inc

Center for hope and safety, inc.'s ("chs") mission is to assist bergen county, nj victims and survivors of domestic violence, including emotional, economic, sexual and physical abuse. the agency provides emergency and transitional housing,…

Human Services
12
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Housing Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
21/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $14,148,440 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTERUNITED SERVICES INC: $13,008,593 · Human ServicesUNITED SERVICES INCSafe Futures Inc: $10,333,168 · Human ServicesSafe Futures IncTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $10,180,008 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INCPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $9,857,335 · Human ServicesPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INCSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC: $9,282,213 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INCNETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $7,132,534 · Human ServicesNETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INCSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $6,890,629 · Human ServicesSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INCMERIDEN-WALLINGFORD CHRYSALIS INC: $6,580,849 · Human ServicesMERIDEN-WALLINGFORD CHRYSALIS INCYWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $3,955,970 · Human ServicesPROJECT SAGE INC: $3,360,627 · Human Services+2 more: $483,089 · Human ServicesBHcare Inc: $16,143,178 · HealthBHcare IncCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $6,041,877 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH C…+1 more: $31,210 · HealthHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC: $11,965,063 · OtherHARTFORD INTERVA…The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $7,184,314 · OtherThe Center For E…+4 more: $495,742 · OtherCOLUMBUS HOUSE INC: $253,133 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $67,083 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INC: $35,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$95,213,455Health$22,216,265Other$19,645,119Housing & Shelter$320,216Crime & Legal$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBHcare Inc: $16,143,178 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $14,148,440 over 9y, 64% of budgetUNITED SERVICES INC: $13,008,593 over 9y, 9.4% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC: $11,965,063 over 9y, 54% of budgetSafe Futures Inc: $10,333,168 over 9y, 42% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $10,180,008 over 9y, 36% of budgetPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $9,857,335 over 9y, 42% of budgetSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC: $9,282,213 over 9y, 58% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $7,184,314 over 9y, 36% of budgetNETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $7,132,534 over 9y, 73% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $6,890,629 over 9y, 36% of budgetMERIDEN-WALLINGFORD CHRYSALIS INC: $6,580,849 over 9y, 78% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $6,041,877 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetYWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $3,955,970 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetPROJECT SAGE INC: $3,360,627 over 9y, 43% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $270,691 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetNEW OPPORTUNITIES INC: $269,684 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS HOUSE INC: $253,133 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNEW LONDON HOMELESS HOSPITALITY CENTER: $212,398 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $204,058 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $67,083 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $31,210 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BHcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Safe Futures Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MERIDEN-WALLINGFORD CHRYSALIS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LONDON HOMELESS HOSPITALITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peoples United Commun…The Petit Family Foun…Liberty Bank Foundati…William Caspar Graust…Ion Bank Foundation I…Olga Sipolin Children…Connecticut Health Fo…American Savings Foun…Eversource Energy Fou…Fairfield County's Co…Hartford Foundation f…The Maximilian E and …
Peoples United Community FoundationCT23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peoples United Community Foundation · The Petit Family Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Olga Sipolin Children's Fund · Connecticut Health Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • The Housing Collective Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Columbus House Inc: 100% of income from government
  • United Services Inc: 74% of income from government
  • New Opportunities Inc: 70% of income from government
  • BHcare Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Journey Home Inc: 59% of income from government
  • The Center for Family Justice Inc: 49% of income from government
  • New London Homeless Hospitality Center: 47% of income from government
  • Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Prudence Crandall Center Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Safe Futures Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Community Health Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center: 10% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • Meriden-Wallingford Chrysalis Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home