· Public charity
Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc
The connecticut coalition against domestic violence, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $182k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
- $250k+15 grants · $21M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BHCARE INC | $2,503,547 |
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER INC | $2,210,637 |
| UNITED SERVICES INC | $2,132,047 |
| HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC | $1,673,839 |
| SAFE FUTURES INC | $1,590,184 |
| PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC | $1,405,319 |
| THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC | $1,385,987 |
| SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WATERBURY INC | $1,331,904 |
| THE NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC | $1,099,516 |
| THE CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT AND EDUCATION INC | $1,090,044 |
| SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC | $1,057,623 |
| MERIDEN-WALLINGFORD CHRYSALIS INC | $968,627 |
| MOSES WEITZMAN HEALTH SYSTEM INC | $812,122 |
| YMCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC | $716,197 |
| PROJECT SAGE INC | $527,296 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BIBHcare Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +23%
- DVDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +53% · 64% of their budget
- USUNITED SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +28%
Funded once
- THTHE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +35%
- ACASNUNTUCK COMMUNITY COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $16k
- COCITY OF HARTFORDone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…
The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…
The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.
The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.
To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.
New hope engages survivors, stakeholders and communities to build an anti-violence movement. using a trauma-informed practice, we work with those impacted by sexual and domestic violence, as well as those persons who use abuse in their…
Mercy housing and shelter corporation provides housing assistance and supportive services to persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. mercy works to empower its clients to become independent, so they may live and work with…
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
To empower and support positive choices for all and to educate and take action in the community for the prevention of oppression and violence.
To reduce the impact and occurrence of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and stalking by providing victim support services and raising community awareness.
Center for hope and safety, inc.'s ("chs") mission is to assist bergen county, nj victims and survivors of domestic violence, including emotional, economic, sexual and physical abuse. the agency provides emergency and transitional housing,…
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Housing Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BHcare Inc ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Safe Futures Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC ↗
- Who funds The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc ↗
- Who funds NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MERIDEN-WALLINGFORD CHRYSALIS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SAGE INC ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LONDON HOMELESS HOSPITALITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Peoples United Community Foundation · The Petit Family Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Olga Sipolin Children's Fund · Connecticut Health Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Housing Collective Inc — 100% of income from government
- Columbus House Inc — 100% of income from government
- United Services Inc — 74% of income from government
- New Opportunities Inc — 70% of income from government
- BHcare Inc — 68% of income from government
- Journey Home Inc — 59% of income from government
- The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
- New London Homeless Hospitality Center — 47% of income from government
- Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
- Prudence Crandall Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- Safe Futures Inc — 15% of income from government
- Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc — 15% of income from government
- Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Crisis Center — 10% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
- Meriden-Wallingford Chrysalis Inc — 1% of income from government
- Susan B Anthony Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.