Skip to content

· Public charity

Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc

The mission of connecticut alliance to end sexual violence is to create communities free of sexual violence and to provide culturally affirming, trauma-informed advocacy, prevention, and intervention services centered on the voices of survivors.

$6.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$44MHealth$4.2M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$645,538
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA NEW BRITAIN SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS SERVICE$1,137,197
WOMEN'S & FAMILIES CENTER$1,049,730
SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT$761,437
THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE$705,605
RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC$645,538
SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WATERBURY$638,040
THE CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT AND EDUCATION$616,993
THE ROWAN CENTER$603,790
SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC$462,184
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$48M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.0M · revenue +64%
  • WA
    WOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.8M · revenue +2% · 36% of their budget
  • SA
    SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.1M · revenue +64% · 90% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Project Sage Inc

    Project SAGE creates social change to end interpersonal, relationship violence by challenging attitudes and beliefs about power, control, and gender norms and by advocating for victims and survivors.

    Human Services
    2
    Safe Voices

    The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

    —
    3
    Ywca of Central Virginia

    The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    4
    Domestic Violence Crisis Center

    DVCC's role is to help those experiencing any level of domestic violence and assist them in building a safer environment for the well-being of themselves and their families. Our services include housing and financial advocacy, legal…

    Human Services
    5
    Center for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Survivors Inc

    The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…

    Human Services
    6
    Community Beyond Violence

    CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

    —
    7
    Family Crisis Center Inc

    The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

    Human Services
    8
    Domestic Violence Project

    The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

    Human Services
    9
    Crisis Center for Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault

    The crisis center is committed to the prevention and elimination of domestic violence and sexual assault. we work to enhance safety and to promote equality in relationships.

    —
    10
    Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

    The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

    Health
    11
    Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc

    The mission of connecticut alliance to end sexual violence is to create communities free of sexual violence and to provide culturally affirming, trauma-informed advocacy, prevention, and intervention services centered on the voices of…

    —
    12
    The Women's Center Inc

    To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Family Justice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Young Womens Christian Association of New Britain Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    9/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC: $8,993,072 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INCSEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $6,115,346 · OtherSEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INCTHE ROWAN CENTER INC: $4,883,628 · OtherTHE ROWAN CENTER INCThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $4,468,771 · OtherThe Center For Empowerment And Education IncWOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER: $6,820,558 · Human ServicesWOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTERSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC: $4,806,264 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INCTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $4,642,539 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INCSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $3,404,889 · Human ServicesSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INCRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC: $4,155,882 · HealthRAPE CRIS…
    Other$24,460,817Human Services$19,674,250Health$4,155,882

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC: $8,993,072 over 9y, 19% of budgetWOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER: $6,820,558 over 9y, 36% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $6,115,346 over 9y, 90% of budgetTHE ROWAN CENTER INC: $4,883,628 over 9y, 63% of budgetSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC: $4,806,264 over 9y, 31% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $4,642,539 over 9y, 16% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $4,468,771 over 9y, 24% of budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC: $4,155,882 over 9y, 75% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $3,404,889 over 9y, 21% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC ↗
    • Who funds WOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER ↗
    • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
    • Who funds THE ROWAN CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC ↗
    • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗
    • Who funds The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc ↗
    • Who funds RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC ↗
    • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
    • The Center for Family Justice Inc: 49% of income from government
    • Women and Families Center: 18% of income from government
    • Rape Crisis Center of Milford Inc: 6% of income from government
    • Susan B Anthony Project Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph