Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Conkey Dorothy D Tr Uind

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$60kEducation$53kAnimals$33kEnvironment$32kArts & Culture$31kYouth Development$15kReligion$11kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$885k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL CORPORATION$5,000
TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$5,000
MA AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$5,000
UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$5,000
SMITH COLLEGE$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$5,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$5,000
YOUNG MEN'S LIBRARY ASSOC OF WARE$2,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH WARE MA$1,300
ST ANDREW'S-SEWANEE SCHOOL$500
ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$500
LEARNING ALLY$500
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$500
TOWN OF WARE$400
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSN$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $500 → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $500 → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $500 → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $500 → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $500 → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $500 → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
MD
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$252k · 23 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
1

Total granted

$252k
$2k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +5%
  • BW
    BAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL CORPORATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +18%
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Plant Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Trustees of the Smith College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MA AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $29,194 · OtherMA AUDUBON SOCIETY INCAMERICAN CANCER SOC MASS DIV INC — $21,694 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOC MASS DIV INCYOUNG MEN'S LIBRARY ASSOC OF WARE — $14,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S LIBRARY ASSOC OF WAREIndividual grant recipient — $12,694 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH WARE MA — $9,100 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH WARE MANATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY — $3,500 · OtherST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $3,500 · Other+7 more — $10,855 · Other+7 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $29,194 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE …UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $16,500 · EducationUNION THEOLOGICAL SE…BAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $29,194 · HealthBAYSTATE WING HO…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER …MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS — $29,194 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FIN…OLD STURBRIDGE INC — $1,400 · Arts & CultureTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $27,439 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES …NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $2,100 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARK…+1 more — $700 · EnvironmentLearning Ally Inc — $3,500 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $2,100 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $1,400 · Youth Development
Other$104,537Education$45,694Health$36,694Arts & Culture$30,594Environment$30,239Human Services$5,600Youth Development$1,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS — $29,194 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $29,194 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $29,194 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $27,439 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $2,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $2,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $1,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOLD STURBRIDGE INC — $1,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC — $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREW'S-SEWANEE SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
  • Who funds BAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS
  • Who funds UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Learning Ally Inc
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC
  • Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC
  • Who funds ST ANDREW'S-SEWANEE SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Conkey Dorothy D Tr Uind funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Baystate Wing Hospital Corporation6% of income from government
  • Old Sturbridge Inc4% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc4% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College1% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph