· Private foundation
Complete Children's Health Charitab Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of COMPLETE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CHARITAB TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLYDE MALONE CENTER | $3,500 |
| MOURNING HOPE GREIF CENTER | $3,500 |
| LINCOLN MEDICAL EDUCTION PARTNERSHI | $3,000 |
| HOPESPOKE | $2,500 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP | $2,000 |
| BE BRAVE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $1,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN | $1,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LINCOLN | $555 |
| DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION FOR FAMIL | $500 |
| ROYAL FAMILY KIDS | $500 |
| NEBRASKA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | $500 |
| HONESTY PROJECT | $450 |
| JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LINCOLN | $450 |
| WOVEN CHARM | $450 |
| LINCOLN NORTHEAST FAMILY CENTER | $450 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FBFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC6× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +25%
- LCLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER5× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +188%
- NSNEBRASKA SPORTS COUNCIL4× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- LLIGHTHOUSEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +28%
- HSHEAD STARTone grant, 2019 · $2k
- LPLINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2020 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.
Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential
Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…
To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.
Community development in lincoln, ne
Labor relations
Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…
To address the root causes of animal homelessness in lincoln, nebraska and surrounding communites.
Building strong communities through access to quality affordable patient centered healthcare to the medically underserved population of Lincoln County, Montana in accordance with requirements set forth in 42 U.S.C. 254C(C)(3)(G).
Voices for children in nebraska is the independent voice building pathways to opportunity for all children and families through research, policy and community engagement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friendship Home of Lincoln Inc and the most unlike its peers is Take Flight Farms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 33. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lincoln Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA SPORTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CLINIC WITH A HEART INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN MEDICAL EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HOPESPOKE ↗
- Who funds AUTISM FAMILY NETWORK OF LINCOLN NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PARTNERS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
- Who funds TAKE FLIGHT FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MOURNING HOPE ↗
- Who funds ST MONICA'S HOME ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LINCOLN INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FORT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Abel Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Cooper Foundation · Lienemann Charitable Foundation Inc · Kinder Porter Scott Family Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · James Stuart III Family Foundation · Jc & Jessie Seacrest Family Fndtn First Nebraska Trust Co Trustee · Duncan Family Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Complete Children's Health Charitab Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Complete Children's Health Charitab Trust?
Find your warmest path to Complete Children's Health Charitab Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.