· Public charity
Compassion Beyond Borders Inc
Provides support to charitable organizations who provide support to impoverished individuals
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $122,672 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $193,996 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $71,324 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC | $39,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA | $24,672 |
| ONE MILLION WELLS - PLEDGE | $15,000 |
| TELEGU ASSN OF GREATER CHICAGO | $15,000 |
| HINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH USA | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| CURE INTERNATIONAL | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC2× · 2018–2019 · $90k · revenue -4%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC2× · 2018–2019 · $37k · revenue +125%- TATELUGU ASSO OF GREATER CHICAGO2× · 2018–2019 · $25k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- NENATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -7%
- AFALLIANCE FOR SMILES INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +4%
- HTHINDU TEMPLE OF GREATER SPRINGFIELDone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba
The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.
One world surgery's mission is to ignite the spirit of service and transform lives by providing access to high-quality surgical care globally.
The organization's objective is to serve humanity in distress, aid local communities,and promote volunteerism in pursuit of its vision of a world of equality where everyone is happy,enjoying good health, and living in harmony with nature.
Water for good's mission is to transform lives through sustainable access to safe water as well as improved sanitation and hygiene in the places that need it most.
Agape Indians Ministries International (AIM Int'l) is an evangelical Christian missions agency incorporated in the United States with the vision of training native missionaries for proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ, planting churches,…
Our mission is to reach the unreached and teach the untaught with the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Sai Global Mission (SGM) is a Non-Profit Organization focused on Societal advancement initiatives for helping rural communities and offering free services to the underserved in the areas of healthcare, education, nutrition and rural care…
Provide financial assistance to orphanages,old-age homes, provide educational scholarships to orphans, arrange health camps and food drives for orphanages and old-age homes.
Charitable Organization built to promote, preserve, and perpetuate the Telangana community in the U.S.
Preserving and propagating Telugu Culture and Language.
Anurag Society exists to bring hope for a promising future to the lives of impoverished individuals and families in India.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cure International Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Million Wells Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds TELUGU ASSO OF GREATER CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds ONE MILLION WELLS INC ↗
- Who funds HINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Telugu Association ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR SMILES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Compassion Beyond Borders Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Compassion Beyond Borders Inc?
Find your warmest path to Compassion Beyond Borders Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.