· Private foundation
Community National Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDEN | $5,833 |
| LAMAR COMMUNITY BETTERMENT COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| USD 413 FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CANEY COMMUNITY BETTERMENT GROUP FO | $3,000 |
| YOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| NEODESHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| CARTHAGE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT COUNCI | $2,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSA | $2,000 |
| KYMEL FORE KIDS GOLF TOURNAMENT | $1,500 |
| CIRCLE TOWANDA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| BUILD FOR THE FUTURE CAMPAIGN (CRMC | $1,500 |
| RUN FOR OLLIE | $1,000 |
| PARSONS HIGH SCHOOL | $600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KS3× · 2021–2023 · $7k
- U4USD 413 Foundation2× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue ×13
- EAEMPORIA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2021 · $5k · revenue -69%
Funded once
- COCITY OF PITTSBURG PARKS & RECone grant, 2023 · $5k
- U4USD 402one grant, 2020 · $3k
- AAALL ABOARD FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +310%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide food to those in need.
To provide food and other needs for people living in kearney mo
To encourage and support economic development in lincoln county, kansas.
Provide services and meals to the elderly and disabled
To provide food and other support to the needy of the City of Eldon and Miller County Missouri.
Provide transportation, commodities, information and outreach to over 700 jefferson county, kansas residents.
Food shelf providing food assistance to people in need in carver county.
Christian Action Ministries is a non-denominational local organization that is dedicated to providing short-term food assistance to individuals and families in Taney and Stone Counties in Missouri who are experiencing temporary crisis.
Provide affordable housing to low-income families
Our Mission is to reach out to those in need in our area by providing healthy and nuritious food and other necessities to families and individuals who cannot afford them. In addition, the Pantry refers families to other agencies which can…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Your Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is All Aboard Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 30. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENCE ↗
- Who funds USD 413 Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds EMPORIA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lamar Community Betterment Council Inc ↗
- Who funds NEODESHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHERRY STREET YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CANEY COMMUNITY BETTERMENT GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALL ABOARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEVADA R-5 SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Greenwood Preservation Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Your Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds KYMEL INC ↗
- Who funds EMPORIA MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds GENESIS INC OF COFFEYVILLE ↗
- Who funds CARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Servant Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community National Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community National Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Community National Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.