Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Mercy Health Partners

The mission of Community Mercy Health Partners is to carry out the bon secours mercy health mission within our community by providing safe, effective, patient/resident centered, timely and cost efficient care and education to meet the health needs of all people, especially the poor and under-served.

$191k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Food & Nutrition$175kHealth$111kCommunity Improvement$45kReligion$12kPhilanthropy$12kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $87,425 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $191,039 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $103,614 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$381M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$45,000
GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC$25,000
SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION$6,000
GREATER SPRINGFIELD CVB$6,000
FAIRBORN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,425
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $8k → 14%GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 9%TRUECHAT INC: $7k → 10%Ohio Tri County Food Alliance: $90k → 15%Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $26k → 16%Champaign County YMCA Foundation: $6k → 19%FAIRBORN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 9%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $45k → 15%TrueChat Inc: $5k → 16%The Gala of Hope Foundation Inc: $15k → 9%OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE: $40k → 15%FAIRBORN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 9%SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%THE GALAL OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 9%GREATER SPRINGFIELD CVB: $14k → 15%Greater Springfield CVB: $6k → 15%GREATER SPRINGFIELD CVB: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 75% of Community Mercy Health Partners’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 24% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Community Mercy Health Partnerslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$259k · 6 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$259k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+101%

Still filing today

83%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +79%
  • GS
    GREATER SPRINGFIELD CONVENTION & VISITOR BUREAU
    3× · 2021–2023 · $28k · revenue +11%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • BS
    Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $26k · revenue +101%
  • TI
    TRUECHAT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • KF
    Kiwanis Foundation Of Springfield Ohio
    one grant, 2023 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Health Foundation of Greater Massillon

The foundation operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the function of, and to carry out the purpose of stark community foundation.

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

4
Crossroads Health Foundation

Partnering with our rural communities to promote health and wellness for all.

Health
5
St Cloud Downtown Alliance Foundation

Enhancing and strengthening our community and our regional core.

6
Ridgecrest Regional Hospital Foundation

To support ridgecrest regional hospital

Health
7
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
8
Second Harvest Foodbank of North Central Ohio

To grow hope in our region by creating pathways to nutritious food.

Food & Nutrition
9
Minneapolis Regional Chamber Development Foundation

The mission of the minneapolis regional chamber development foundation is to offer innovative ways of reducing unemployment, improve educational opportunities for disadvantaged youth, initiate and conduct leadership development programs…

Community Improvement
10
Central Neighborhood Health Foundation

The organization's mission is to minimize disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior-quality, patient-centered healthcare through an integrated delivery system for underserved and vulnerable multi-ethnic…

Health
11
Salem Health Foundation

The salem health foundation is dedicated to raising, managing and distributing funds to help salem health achieve its mission of improving the health and well-being of the people and community it serves.

Health
12
Springforward

To aid in the economic development, revitalization, and elimination of blight in the city of springfield and the city's core downtown area.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Community Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Nehemiah Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $130,050 · Food & NutritionOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND…SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $45,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BA…FAIRBORN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $17,186 · OtherFAIRBORN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERC…NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION — $12,000 · OtherNEHEMIAH FOUNDATIONTRUECHAT INC — $6,839 · OtherTRUECHAT INCKiwanis Foundation Of Springfield Ohio — $6,000 · OtherKiwanis Foundation Of Springfiel…CHAMPAIGN COUNTY YMCA FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherCHAMPAIGN COUNTY YMCA FOUNDATIONGREATER SPRINGFIELD CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU INC — $6,000 · OtherGREATER SPRINGFIELD CONVENTION A…TrueChat Inc — $5,391 · OtherTHE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · HealthTHE GALA OF HOPE FOUND…American Heart Association Inc — $17,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Associa…GREATER SPRINGFIELD CONVENTION & VISITOR BUREAU — $27,703 · Community ImprovementBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $26,000 · ReligionTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Philanthropy
Food & Nutrition$130,050Other$104,416Health$72,500Community Improvement$27,703Religion$26,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $130,050 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER SPRINGFIELD CONVENTION & VISITOR BUREAU — $27,703 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRBORN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $17,186 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetNEHEMIAH FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER SPRINGFIELD CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Mercy Health Partners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph