Skip to content
Community Hospital Association of McCook at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Hospital Association of McCook

Leading our region to a healthier future.

$468k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$805kHuman Services$469kEducation$184kArts & Culture$150kRecreation & Sports$81kCommunity Improvement$60kPhilanthropy$40k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $381k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$99M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF MCCOOK$152,625
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$103,332
Individual grant recipient$70,000
MCCOOK COLLEGE FOUNDATION$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$30,000
MCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP$19,520
RED WILLOW CO FAIR BOARD$15,000
NORTH PLATTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,000
MCCOOK AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $469k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF MCCOOK: $202k → 12%YMCA OF MCCOOK: $153k → 12%YMCA OF MCCOOK: $105k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 38% of Community Hospital Association of McCook’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 61%.

Community Hospital Association of McCooklessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 13 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$1.7M
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+10%

Still filing today

77%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $675k · revenue +126%
  • YO
    YMCA OF MCCOOK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $459k · revenue +64%
  • MC
    MCCOOK COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • TN
    The Norris Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -61%
  • MP
    MCCOOK PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • MC
    MCCOOK CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
2
Nebraska Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The nebraska chamber of commerce & industry (the chamber) is a statewide business organization established to maintain and improve the economic progress and business climate of the state of nebraska. the chamber was organized to promote,…

—
3
Nebraska Medical Foundation

To support activities, including the awarding of scholarships to medical students, promote the wellness and health of citizens in nebraska, provide education on medical subjects, and other research projects consistent with its activities.

Health
4
The Nebraska Cooperative Council Education Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to encourage high school graduates to pursue higher education in the agricultural and agribusiness fields through scholarships and the implementation of school-to-work programs with participating nebraska…

Education
5
Nebraska Methodist College of Nursing and Allied Health

Nebraska methodist college of nursing & allied health is a health professions institution providing education in healthcare related fields.

—
6
Mccook Library Foundation

Promotion of the mccook public library

Education
7
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
8
Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—
9
Nebraska Medical Education Fund Inc

To provide scholarships to assist worthy and needy students in the medical profession and allied health field.

—
10
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
11
Nebraska Medical Association

Promote the common interests of nebraska physicians

Health
12
Cozad Development Corporation

Foster Business Development in Cozad, NE

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Nebraska Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $674,538 · HealthCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION+1 more: $20,000 · HealthYMCA OF MCCOOK: $459,165 · Human ServicesYMCA OF MCCOOK+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…RED WILLOW CO FAIR BOARD: $60,000 · OtherRED WILLOW CO FAIR BO…RED WILLOW CO FAIR BOARD: $60,000 · OtherRED WILLOW CO FAIR BO…MCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $42,720 · OtherMCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVEL…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $25,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIO…MCCOOK AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,000 · OtherMCCOOK PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,850 · OtherMCCOOK CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $12,500 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherMCCOOK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $158,800 · EducationMCCOOK COLLEGE…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $67,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …ROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC: $10,000 · EducationNORTH PLATTE COMM COLLEGE FOUND INC: $30,450 · PhilanthropyCATTLEMEN'S BALL OF NEBRASKA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyThe Norris Institute: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$694,538Human Services$469,165Other$333,070Education$236,300Philanthropy$35,450Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $674,538 over 9y, 22% of budgetYMCA OF MCCOOK: $459,165 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMCCOOK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $158,800 over 8y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $67,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $42,720 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetNORTH PLATTE COMM COLLEGE FOUND INC: $30,450 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Norris Institute: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCCOOK AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC: $10,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCATTLEMEN'S BALL OF NEBRASKA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHADRON STATE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nebraska Community Fo…The Graff Charitable …The Sherwood Foundati…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Nebraska Community FoundationNE23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nebraska Community Foundation · The Graff Charitable Foundation Inc Co P Mark Graff · The Sherwood Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Hospital Association of McCook funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Hospital Association of McCook. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Hospital Association of McCook’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home