Skip to content
Community Helpers USA Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Helpers USA Inc

To help refugees in housing, food assistance, utility assistance, transportation and driving.

$441k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$223kFood & Nutrition$75kHuman Services$20kEducation$16kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $136,310, the rows itemized in this filing. The $440,941 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $304,631 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$48,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$227k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAND IN HAND YEMEN$62,690
RABBANA NARJU RIDHAK$48,000
HELPING HAND$20,000
MY DROP OF LIFE$5,620
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HELPING HAND: $20k → 8%HAND IN HAND YEMEN: $63k → 21%HAND IN HAND: $62k → 21%HAND IN HAND: $49k → 21%HAND IN HAND: $16k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
3
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
4
Us Help Inc

We are a non-profit charity organization that humbly aims to provide to those in need around the world. With gratitude & love, we try to provide food, water, clothing, shelter, peace & education to needy persons, families and communities.

Human Services
5
Zahra Foundation Ltd

Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world

International
6
Hamdard Humanitarian Relief in

Providing essentials, medicine, food, grocery, construction related assistance to the needy people specially widows and orphans.

International
7
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Human Development Foundation of North America

To facilitate a Non-Political Movement for Positive Social Change and Community Empowerment through Mass Literacy, Enhanced Quality of Education,Universal Primary Healthcare and Grassroots Economic Development.

International
9
Small Efforts

To reduce poverty in Pakistan by empowering poor and underprivileged people.

International
10
Humanity Increased

Humanity-Increased is an international charity whose mission is to help those in need and promote human transformation. The teachings of Islam inspire our mission, and we strive to embody its values of compassion, empathy, and service to…

International
11
Mafrad

Support rural areas in morocco

—
12
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hand for Relief and Development Inc; the most unlike its peers is Deccan Alumni Association of North America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hand in Hand Yemen Inc: $190,644 · Human ServicesHand in Hand Yemen IncHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INCRABBANA NARJU RIDHAK: $48,000 · OtherRABBANA NARJU RIDHAKNISA HELP FOUNDATION: $9,092 · OtherNISA HELP FOUNDATIONMIFTAAH INSTITUTE: $6,500 · OtherMIFTAAH INSTITUTEHumans for Human: $6,000 · OtherHumans for HumanSAKINA CHARITY: $5,000 · OtherSAKINA CHARITYDROP OF LIFE CORPORATION: $24,939 · EnvironmentI-CARE FUND AMERICA INC: $11,050 · InternationalRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $10,783 · InternationalFAJR SCIENTIFIC: $15,000 · Science & TechDeccan Alumni Association Of North America: $2,148 · Education
Human Services$210,644Other$74,592Environment$24,939International$21,833Science & Tech$15,000Education$2,148

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHand in Hand Yemen Inc: $190,644 over 5y, 56% of budgetRABBANA NARJU RIDHAK: $48,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetDROP OF LIFE CORPORATION: $24,939 over 2y, 20% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAJR SCIENTIFIC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetI-CARE FUND AMERICA INC: $11,050 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $10,783 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDeccan Alumni Association Of North America: $2,148 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Helpers USA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Helpers USA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $449k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Helpers USA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home