Skip to content
Community Health Foundation of Kay County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Health Foundation of Kay County Inc

To enable the citizens of the Kay County regional area to have better access to medical services and programs by assisting various medical care providers.

$209k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $155,050, the rows itemized in this filing. The $208,558 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,508 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
$13,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$30,000
NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY$30,000
RSVP$18,450
NORTHERN OKLAHOMA YOUTH SERVICES$17,600
SURVIVOR RESOURCE NETWORK$17,500
HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$13,500
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES$7,700
BLACKWELL MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,500
DEARING HOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$5,300
CASA FOR KIDS KAY COUNTY$3,500
CITY ARTS$2,500
UNITED WAY DRUG STORE PROGRAM$2,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
2
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
3
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
4
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
5
South Central Casa of Oklahoma Inc

Recruit, screen, train and monitor volunteers to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children in the judicial system.

Civil Rights
6
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
7
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
8
Oklahoma Association of Community Action

To alleviate the causes of poverty by supporting oklahoma's community action agencies, which includes providing coordinated services, training and other assitance to member agencies.

Human Services
9
22nd Judicial District Casa Inc

Court Appointed Special Advocate

Education
10
Child Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc

to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children

Human Services
11
Casa of Northeast Oklahoma Inc

Casa of northeast oklahoma provides a voice for abused and neglected children in the courts of rogers, mayes, craig, ottawa, delaware and washington counties, as well as the shawnee's tribal court.

Civil Rights
12
Children's Advocacy Centers of Oklahoma Inc

To enhance communication and to support the development, growth and continuation of children's advocacy centers in oklahoma. also to promote public awareness concerning the problems of child abuse throughout oklahoma.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Emergency Resource Agency Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dearing House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INC: $35,100 · OtherNORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INCNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $30,000 · OtherNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INCHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $13,500 · OtherHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMABLACKWELL MIDDLE SCHOOL: $6,500 · OtherBLACKWELL MIDDLE SCHOOL+1 more: $2,500 · OtherREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF…UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC: $20,950 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF N…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $7,700 · Human ServicesDearing House Inc: $5,300 · Youth DevelopmentCASA FOR KIDS INC: $3,500 · Civil Rights
Other$87,600Food & Nutrition$30,000Philanthropy$20,950Human Services$7,700Youth Development$5,300Civil Rights$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INC: $35,100 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC: $20,950 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $7,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA FOR KIDS INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Online Givin…
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Foundation of Kay County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Foundation of Kay County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • United Way of North Central Oklahoma Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Health Foundation of Kay County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home