Loading…
· Public charity
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ASSOCIATION OF
The COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ASSOCIATION OF mississippi represents the interests of its members in statewide efforts to improve access to health care for the medically under served and indigent population of mississippi.
$32k
Granted FY2019
3
Grants
1
Communities
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
deltacomprehensiveprimary
2020
obesity counselingchildhood obesity
2021
direct reliefrelief foodfood insecurityvaccinesunderservedadvance equityequity mississippians
2022
accessibleprimarydirect reliefrelief foodfood insecurityunderservedhealthcare
2023
accessible affordablehealthcare uninsureduninsured underservedunderserved populationsaccessible availableavailable affordableaffordable managed
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
02FY2019 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
- GA CARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CTR$11,000
- AARON E HENRY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$7,000
- DELTA HEALTH CENTER$7,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 23% — the area typically sits at 18%. 56% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Southeast Community Health Systems
The mission of Southeast Community Health Systems is to provide quality, affordable healthcare to all patients in underserved areas and to improve the health and wellness of the communities we serve.
—
2
Claiborne County Family Health Center Inc
The mission of CCFHC is to provide quality, accessible, available, affordable, managed primary and preventive health care services.
Health
3
Capitol City Family Health Center Inc
To provide quality, affordable health care to all.
Health
4
Leflore County Health Center
To provide healthcare to low income persons
Health
5
Gulf Coast Health Center Inc
To provide accessible, affordable, quality family health, dental, vision and behavioral care within the Gulf Coast Service areas.
Health
6
Primary Health Services Center Inc
To provide quality, comprehensive, compassionate, and culturally appropriate primary and preventive healthcare services to residents in medically underserved North Louisiana.
Health
7
Jonesboro Church Health Center Inc
JCHCs mission is to offer high-quality, compassionate care to low-income indivduals who lack access to adequate healthcare.
Health
8
Atascosa Health Center Inc
Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on ability to pay.
Health
9
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc
Provide quality healthcare to the people of edgecombe, nash and wilson counties.
—
10
1ST Choice Healthcare Inc
To provide quality affordable primary healthcare to northeast arkansas without regard to financial barriers.
—
11
Community Health Services Inc
To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.
Health
12
St Gabriel Health Clinic Inc
To provide primary preventive health services to the medically insured, underinsured & underserved population of Iberville and surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay and increase the span of healthy life, reduce hlth disparities…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Central Mississippi Healthcare Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gacarmichael Family Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
17/17
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$18,000Other$7,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Direct ReliefCA32.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · MAGnet HCCN · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ASSOCIATION OF funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GA CARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CTR.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 640580940 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on GA CARMICHAEL FAMILY HEALTH CTR, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Community Health Center Association Of?
Find your warmest path to Community Health Center Association Of through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines