How much did COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k5 grants · $34k
$10k–50k5 grants · $107k
$250k+1 grant · $377k

$10,600

Median grant

States reached

$20M

Total assets

Largest grants

INCOMPASS HEALTHCARE$376,603
TOWN OF PATRIOT$32,727
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND CO$26,421
SWITZERLAND COUNTY GOVERNMENT$24,900
GIRLS INC OF JEFFERSON COUNTY$11,915
SWITZERLAND COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION$10,600
SWITZERLAND COUNTY FFA CHAPTER$9,145
SWISS WINE FESTIVAL$7,435
JEFF CRAIG FIRE AND RESCUE$6,800
SWITZERLAND COUNTY EMERGENCY RESPONSE$5,394
BROADS ON BOARDS LLC$5,200

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 13%. 78% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.9M · 17 repeat orgs$183k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%

+51%

Still filing today

71%

44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

IH
INCOMPASS HEALTHCARE
2× · 2022–2025 · $382k · revenue +54%
SC
SWITZERLAND COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION
4× · 2017–2020 · $371k · revenue +2166%
IT
IVY TECH FOUNDATION
3× · 2017–2019 · $78k · revenue +60%

Funded once

SC
SWITZERLAND COUNTY HOUSINGgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +51%
EE
EAST ENTERPRISE REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
one grant, 2019 · $16k
MC
MOOREFIELD COMMUNITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Switzerland County Tourism Inc

To contribute to the economic health of switzerland county by promoting, marketing, building & sustaining the vital tourism industry through the attraction of visitors to stay, shop, dine, tour & recreate in our historically rich &…

Community Improvement

Spring Creek Volunteer Fire Department

Provide fire protection first reponse medical to all residents twp#8

Public Safety & Disaster

Switzerland Co Public Schools

To provide educational resources for the students, staff and faculty and schools in the vevay area

Education

Community Foundation of Switzerland

To engage in programs & activities benefiting the residents of switzerland county.

Philanthropy

Swift Creek Rural Fire Department

Provide fire protection and rescue services to citizens in the swift creek fire district.

—

East Sullivan County Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster

German Township Volunteer Fire Dept

To provide fire protection and rescue services to the residences and business in german township, bartholomew county, indiana

Public Safety & Disaster

Swiss Village Inc

As a continuing care retirement community, swiss village offers residents a full range of accommodations, recreational activities and intergenerational programs

Human Services

Southern Door Fire Department Inc

Provide firefighting service to the public and educate the public about fire safety in rural door county, wi

—

Scott Township Volunteer Fire

Fire and ems protection

—

Switzerland County Public Library

Community service - providing for a lifelong learning and leisure pursuit to switzerland county residents through free lending of resources and programming.

Education

Floyd County Volunteer Fire Department

Fire protection for the citizens of Floyd County

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern Indiana Economic and the most unlike its peers is Switz-Cor Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/32

the rest of the field

36/382

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

16/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,392,622Health$381,708Human Services$109,682Education$83,701Youth Development$34,626Philanthropy$26,421Housing & Shelter$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vevay Switzerland County Foundation IncIN20.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vevay Switzerland County Foundation Inc · Dearborn Community Foundation Inc · Switzerland County Tourism Inc · Community Foundation of Madison And · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HISTORIC VEVAY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +57% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 311076143 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HISTORIC VEVAY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 40% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Community Foundation of Switzerland?

Find your warmest path to Community Foundation of Switzerland through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Foundation of Switzerland?

More from the funding graph

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SWITZERLAND

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Foundation of Switzerland?

More from the funding graph