· Community foundation
Community Foundation of Southwest Kansas
The mission of the Community Foundation of Southwest Kansas is to improve the quality of life in the Southwest Kansas area by providing ongoing philanthropic leadership and maintaining and enhancing the educational, social, cultural, health, and civic resources of the community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 124 grants below total $1,130,970 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,377,931 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $246,961 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k81 grants · $375k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $641k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $114k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Dodge City Community College Foundation | $64,375 |
| Cerebral Palsy Research Foundation | $50,000 |
| Quivira Council Boy Scouts of America | $35,000 |
| Dodge City Family YMCA | $30,000 |
| Manor of the Plains | $28,000 |
| Arrowhead West Inc | $27,702 |
| Kansas Food Bank Warehouse | $25,000 |
| Kansas Food Bank Warehouse | $25,000 |
| Hospice of the Prairie Inc | $20,000 |
| First United Methodist Church | $20,000 |
| Ford County Humane Society | $20,000 |
| New Chance | $17,850 |
| Santa Fe Trail Council -- BSA | $17,850 |
| First United Methodist Church | $17,850 |
| SunPorch of Dodge City | $16,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $875k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
84 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBoot Hill Museum Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $480k · revenue +36%
- PFPERFECT FIT FOUNDATION OF SWK6× · 2019–2024 · $265k · revenue +360% · 45% of their budget
- AWArrowhead West Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $219k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- TKThe Kansas University Endowment Associationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +64%
- HCHodgeman Community Foundationone grant, 2021 · $28k
- KDKANSAS DENTAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance the life, culture, and community of South Central Kansas by connecting people who care with causes that matter.
The Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas servces the region by encouraging charitable giving benefiting the common good and the quality of life.
Promote the Pittsburg, Kansas business community.
The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.
To support members in farming
Provide services and meals to the elderly and disabled
The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.
Engage in educational, scientific, and governmental efforts to conserve, develop, and improve the use of land, soil, water, plants, animals, and other natural resources within the state of kansas
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian Manors Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pet's Miracle Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Boot Hill Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds FORD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Fe Trail Council Boy Scouts of America Inc ↗
- Who funds PERFECT FIT FOUNDATION OF SWK ↗
- Who funds THE DODGE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Arrowhead West Inc ↗
- Who funds Depot Theater Company ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Southwest Kansas Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Southwest Kansas ↗
- Who funds NEW CHANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Compass Behavioral Health ↗
- Who funds Dodge City Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Prairie Inc ↗
- Who funds EMBERHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Lift Minneola Incorporated ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC ↗
- Who funds Claude and Donalda Stauth Foundation ↗
- Who funds Rural Education and Workforce Alliance ↗
- Who funds DODGE CITY AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds DODGE CITY ROUNDUP INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP FEAST ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Dodge City-Ford County Development Corpo ration ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CORE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS SENIOR LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Dodge City Inc ↗
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Western Kansas Community Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · The Mariah Fund Inc · United Way of Dodge City Inc · Finnup Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Dodge City-Ford County Development Corpo ration · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · Berry Foundation Inc · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc · Baughman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Southwest Kansas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.