Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Community Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$160kHuman Services$83kReligion$48kEducation$31kPhilanthropy$30kRecreation & Sports$26kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HISTORIC HAYMARKET MILWAUKEE I INC$20,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$3,500
CEDAR LAKES CONVERSATION FOUNDATION$3,100
OLD WORLD WI FOUNDATION INC$3,000
CHANNEL 1036 FRIENDS INC - IND GIV$2,000
HONOURS INC$2,000
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ST MARCUS SCHOOL$1,500
ST LUKE LUTHERAN CHURCH ELCA$1,500
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE$1,500
NAMI WASHINGTON COUNTY INC$1,500
WOMEN'S CENTER OF WAUKESHA$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HELPING PAWS: $2k → 11%HELPING PAWS: $2k → 11%HELPING PAWS: $1k → 11%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $500 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NJ
CA
KS
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$480k · 52 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
11

Total granted

$480k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+15%

Still filing today

46%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +185%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +70%
  • MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • FO
    FORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • DJ
    DR JAMES E ALBRECHT FREE CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -85%
  • IC
    INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS - WASH CTY
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
2
Milwaukee County Historical Society Inc

The milwaukee county historical society was founded in 1935 to collect, preserve, and make available materials relating to the history of the milwaukee community.

Arts & Culture
3
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

5
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

6
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
7
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

8
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
9
Wisconsin Hospital Association Inc

The wisconsin hospital association, inc.'s (wha) mission is advocating for the ability of its members to provide high quality health care services to wisconsin communities.the association fulfills this mission through the following values:…

10
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

11
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
12
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mile Monsters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArts & Culture OrganizationsNature Conservation & Outdo…Animal Rescue and AdoptionImmigrant & Refugee Communi…Youth & Vulnerable Populati…Health Systems and PlansCharter and Alternative Sch…Service Club FoundationsSenior Housing and CareFaith-Based Community Devel…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr18%22%20–35yr15%44%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%16%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr15%32%35–55yr16%31%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
2,414/18,121

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OLD WORLD WI FOUNDATION INC — $24,000 · OtherOLD WORLD WI FOUNDATION INCCHANNEL 1036FRIENDS INC - IND GIV — $21,500 · OtherCHANNEL 1036FRIENDS INC - IND GIVADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCH — $20,700 · OtherADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $20,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY — $20,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION — $16,500 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONWAUWATOSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $14,500 · OtherLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US — $13,500 · OtherLUTHER MANOR — $13,000 · OtherADVENT CHURCH - HAITI FUND — $10,300 · Other+35 more — $129,744 · Other+35 moreHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc — $40,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Haymarket Milw…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $19,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM…MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC — $15,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $11,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM IN…EAST TROY RAILROAD MUSEUM INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureEAST TROY RAILROAD MUSE…+3 more — $7,600 · Arts & Culture+3 moreTHE LUTHERAN HOME INC — $13,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $8,600 · HealthVERSITI WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 · HealthNAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $1,500 · HealthFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC — $1,000 · HealthCOLON CANCER COALITION INC — $1,000 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $20,500 · Human ServicesHELPING PAWS INC — $4,500 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesHONOURS INC — $7,000 · EducationWAUWATOSA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,250 · EducationELMBROOK HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $9,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $3,500 · Recreation & SportsNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCEDAR LAKES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $6,600 · Environment
Other$303,844Arts & Culture$102,600Health$27,100Human Services$25,500Education$16,250Recreation & Sports$14,000Environment$6,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC — $15,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWAUWATOSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $14,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US — $13,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LUTHERAN HOME INC — $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAD LAKE INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUSO WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetELMBROOK HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $9,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetEAST TROY RAILROAD MUSEUM INC — $9,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $8,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHONOURS INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCEDAR LAKES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $6,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWAUWATOSA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetHELPING PAWS INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COMMUNITY SAILING CENTER INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE THEATRE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMilwaukee Yacht Club Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMARCO ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVERSITI WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDR JAMES E ALBRECHT FREE CLINIC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMile Monsters Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOLON CANCER COALITION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN SOUTHEAST INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC
  • Who funds WAUWATOSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US
  • Who funds THE LUTHERAN HOME INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds LAD LAKE INC
  • Who funds USO WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds ELMBROOK HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds EAST TROY RAILROAD MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds HONOURS INC
  • Who funds CEDAR LAKES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WAUWATOSA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HELPING PAWS INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI29.4× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · West Bend Community Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Hauske Family Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Oscar & Augusta Schlegel Fdn · Melitta S and Joan M Pick Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc15% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Venice Theatre Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph