Skip to content

· Public charity

Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc

Lead engaged partners in the fight against hunger in eastern oklahoma.

$50M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $261,780, the rows itemized in this filing. The $50,430,989 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,169,209 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $151k
$32,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$55M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CFBEO REAL ESTATE INC$92,860
GREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$58,310
CARING COMMUNITY FRIENDS$40,000
BROKEN ARROW NEIGHBORS$32,000
HELPING HANDS FOOD PANTRY$15,600
HAND TO HAND INC$13,650
VINITA DAY CENTER$9,360
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%BROKEN ARROW NEIGHBORS: $32k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
2
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
3
Temporary Help in Emergency House

Emergency housing

—
4
Family Promise of Tulsa County Inc

Poverty alleviation/homelessness prevention

Housing & Shelter
5
Samaritan Ministries

Provide temporary housing to people in crisis situations, provide counseling and other services 24 hours a day without regard to race, creed or religion

Philanthropy
6
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
7
Claritas House Outreach Ministry

Food&clothing service-homeless

—
8
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
9
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
10
Emergency Christian Ministries Inc

A religious and community-based ministry for those who are homeless and in need.

Human Services
11
Outer Court Ministries Inc

Provide assistance and shelter to abused and homeless women.

Human Services
12
Christian Care

Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gods Helping Hands; the most unlike its peers is Ark of Faith Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

144 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
39
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/144
Grantees still filing
86/144
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CFBEO REAL ESTATE INC: $92,860 · Food & NutritionCFBEO REAL ESTATE INCCARING COMMUNITY FRIENDS INC: $40,000 · OtherCARING COMMUNITY FRIENDS INCPICKENS COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $15,600 · OtherPICKENS COMMUNITY LIBRARYHAND TO HAND INC: $13,650 · OtherHAND TO HAND INCVINITA DAY CENTER INC: $9,360 · OtherVINITA DAY CENTER INCGREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $58,310 · HealthGREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL …BROKEN ARROW NEIGHBORS INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesBROKEN ARROW …
Food & Nutrition$92,860Other$78,610Health$58,310Human Services$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCFBEO REAL ESTATE INC: $92,860 over 1y, 36% of budgetGREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $58,310 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHAND TO HAND INC: $13,650 over 8y, 23% of budgetVINITA DAY CENTER INC: $9,360 over 8y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CFBEO REAL ESTATE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CARING COMMUNITY FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BROKEN ARROW NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAND TO HAND INC ↗
  • Who funds VINITA DAY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK68.3× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Area United Way · The Gelvin Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · St John Health System Inc · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Green Country Behavioral Health Services: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph