Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cadca

CADCA is the only national membership-based organization representing community drug prevention coalitions.

$119k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192023.

Health$20kEducation$11kPhilanthropy$10kCrime & Legal$7kOther$22k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $18,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $119,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $100,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC$6,500
ALLEN COUNTY DRUG AND ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC$6,500
PREVENTION RESOURCES INC$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%FORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC: $7k → 8%UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY: $10k → 13%GWINNETT COALITION FOR HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $10k → 9%ALLEN COUNTY DRUG AND ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC: $7k → 12%PREVENTION RESOURCES INC: $7k → 4%PACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG FREE COMMUNITIES: $7k → 13%THE SCOTTSVILLE ALLEN COUNTY FAITH COALITIONS: $7k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND OFFICE OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION: $11k → 9%PREVENTION RESOURCES INC: $6k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NV
IN
NJ
KY
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prevention Michigan

Cultivate healthy communities across michigan through resourses, technical assistance, and support.

Civil Rights
2
Roane County Anti Drug Coalition

To reduce youth substance use; to educate and raise awareness of drug issues; to promote community involvement; and to strengthen community partnerships and prevention strategies in Roane County.

Health
3
Hamilton County Coalition

Facilitate safe healthy drug free communities through comprehensive strategies and community based collaborations both private and governmental primary target is young people.

Human Services
4
Henry County Prevention Coalition

Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families

Education
5
Linking Efforts Against Drugs

The Organization envisions a healthy community where youth choose not to use alcohol and other drugs. Through parent education, dynamic youth programs, and engagement with key community stakeholders, the Organization is dedicated to the…

6
Drug Strategies

Drug strategies promotes more effective approaches to the nation's drug problems and supports private and public efforts to reduce the demand for drugs through prevention, education and treatment.

Public Benefit
7
Rize Prevention Inc

As an organization, our vision is to create effective, proven solutions to one of the biggest crises affecting our state and country today- substance use and co-occurring mental health disorders among youth. 3 out of 10 middle school…

8
Drug Free Marion County

Advocates for a healthier and safer county through prevention and education to reduce substance abuse among youth and adults

Health
9
Blue Ribbon Commission on the Prevention of Youth Violence

Connecting youth with pathways to success.

Youth Development
10
Prevention Coalition for Success Inc

Focused on preventing substance misuse in youth and young adults in rutherford county, tennessee.

Health
11
Jay County Drug Prevention Coalition Inc

The mission of jay county drug prevention coalition (jcdpc) is to empower youth and adults through education, awareness, advocacy, and relationships to strengthen an improved quality of life for all. our goals and focus are to (1) promote…

Health
12
PreventionFIRST

Mission: PreventionFIRST! implements best practice strategies to reduce the risk of behavioral health disorders. Vision: All communities apply prevention strategies in every stage of life.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Bend Regional Council On Substance Abuse and the most unlike its peers is University of New England. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Prevention Resources Inc — $12,000 · OtherPrevention Resources IncGWINNETT COALITION INC — $10,000 · OtherGWINNETT COALITION INCPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES — $6,500 · HealthPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG…ALLEN COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC — $6,500 · HealthALLEN COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL CONS…FORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE — $6,500 · HealthFORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SU…University of New England — $11,000 · EducationUniversity of New …UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BR…SCOTTSVILLE-ALLEN COUNTY FAITH COALITION INC — $6,500 · Crime & LegalSCOTTSVILL…
Other$22,000Health$19,500Education$11,000Philanthropy$10,000Crime & Legal$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPrevention Resources Inc — $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of New England — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES — $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLEN COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL CONSORTIUM INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCOTTSVILLE-ALLEN COUNTY FAITH COALITION INC — $6,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFORT BEND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE — $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cadca funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 63%
  • Prevention Resources Inc63% of income from government
  • United Way of Broward County Inc27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $40k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph