Skip to content

· Public charity

Community Activities Inc of Ardmore

Improve community services and facilities for the enjoyment and well-being of the general public.

$137k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Education$153kHealth$97kRecreation & Sports$82kHuman Services$37kArts & Culture$24kCrime & Legal$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $72,714, the rows itemized in this filing. The $137,261 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $64,547 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNSTON COUNTY VETERANS CENTER$36,714
MURRAY STATE COLLEGE$18,000
ARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%JOHNSTON COUNTY VETERANS CENTER: $37k → 21%GLORIA AINSWORTH CHILD CARE: $5k → 16%GLORIA AINSWORTH CHILD CARE: $5k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216k · 3 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$216k
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+118%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEnvironmentHealthCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    ARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL
    6× · 2021–2026 · $106k · revenue -5%
  • MS
    MURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $100k · revenue +349%
  • GA
    GLORIA AINSWORTH CHILD CARE & LEARNING CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • LB
    Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centersgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $97k · revenue +131%
  • SO
    SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $41k · revenue 0%
  • CO
    CASA OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +118%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Activities Inc of Ardmore

Improve community services and facilities for the enjoyment and well-being of the general public.

Human Services
2
Crisis Center of Anderson & Cherokee Co

To aid and support victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and child abuse.

Human Services
3
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
4
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
5
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
6
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
7
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
8
Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc

Providing facilities related to the investigation and treatment of victims of child abuse and to provide education and coordination to child abuse prevention efforts by various organizations in Garfield County, OK.

Human Services
9
22nd Judicial District Casa Inc

Court Appointed Special Advocate

Education
10
Owasso Community Resources Inc

Build a stronger community through volunteerism, community coordination and access to services.

Philanthropy
11
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
12
Conway County Care Center

Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gloria Ainsworth Child Care & Learning Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ardmore Beautification Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL: $106,000 · EnvironmentARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCILMURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationMURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDAT…Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers: $96,913 · HealthLighthouse Behavioral Welln…Johnston County Veterans Center: $36,714 · Human ServicesJohnston Coun…GLORIA AINSWORTH CHILD CARE & LEARNING CENTER INC: $9,939 · Human ServicesGLORIA AINSWO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,341 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,688 · OtherSOUTHERN OKL…SOUTHERN OK HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherSOUTHERN OK …CASA OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Environment$106,000Education$100,000Health$96,913Human Services$48,994Other$43,188Civil Rights$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL: $106,000 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetMURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetLighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers: $96,913 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,688 over 1y, 15% of budgetGLORIA AINSWORTH CHILD CARE & LEARNING CENTER INC: $9,939 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,341 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation IncOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation Inc · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Activities Inc of Ardmore funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Activities Inc of Ardmore. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Activities Inc of Ardmore?

Find your warmest path to Community Activities Inc of Ardmore through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Activities Inc of Ardmore’s filings →

More from the funding graph