Skip to content

· Public charity

Commonwealth Cornerstone Group

The organization makes loans to qualified businesses for the development and or rehabilitation of real estate, including mixed use properties whose redevelopment is critical for the revitalization of lower income communities; to finance community facilities that provide services not currently available to residents in those communities;…

$39M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$38MCommunity Improvement$350kCrime & Legal$150k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,161,510
Median grant
1
States reached
$165M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HOME PRES$5,000,000
REGENT TERRACE$4,800,000
VERNON HOUSE$3,500,000
ALLEGHENY YMCA$2,200,000
901 MILL REVIVAL$2,148,000
MILL II$2,000,000
CLOISTERS III$1,700,000
NEW FREEDOM$1,575,000
HOMEWOOD$1,500,000
LANDISVILLE I$1,350,000
DALMATIA ELDERLY$1,350,000
GALLATIN SCHOOL LIVING CENTRE$1,183,200
CORAOPOLIS GARDENS$1,161,510
WALNUT ST APTS$1,080,000
PROJECT HOME ST ELIZABETH$1,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALLEGHENY YMCA: $2.2M → 11%IMPACT HARRISBURG: $350k → 12%GALLATIN SCHOOL LIVING CENTRE: $1.2M → 17%LIGHT OF LIFE: $660k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vision for Life

To impact community housing

Housing & Shelter
2
Senior Citizens Housing Dev Corporation of Stonington

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
3
Senior Citizens Housing Develop Corp of Ville Platte

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped. regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

—
4
Senior Citizens Housing Development of Claremont Inc

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped. regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
5
Antioch Hillcrest Terrace Inc

Provide subsidized housing (65 units) for elderly low-income seniors under section 202 of the national housing act and the u.s. department of housing and urban development.

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
7
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
8
Ncscusa Housing Development Corp Two

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
9
Senior Citizens Hsg Develop Corp of Washington

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
10
Senior Citizens Hsg Develop Corp of Mt Lebanon

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
11
Ncscusa Housing Development Corp Three Inc

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
12
Pittsburgh Housing Development Corp

To initiate, plan, finance, develop and manage housing development in the City of Pittsburgh, and upon request, in other municipalities with particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on such development in low to moderate income census…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Home Community Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Pittsburgh. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENT TERRACE: $4,800,000 · OtherREGENT TERRACEVERNON HOUSE: $3,500,000 · OtherVERNON HOUSE901 MILL REVIVAL: $2,148,000 · Other901 MILL REVIVALMILL II: $2,000,000 · OtherMILL IICLOISTERS III: $1,700,000 · OtherCLOISTERS IIINEW FREEDOM: $1,575,000 · OtherNEW FREEDOMHOMEWOOD: $1,500,000 · OtherHOMEWOODDALMATIA ELDERLY: $1,350,000 · OtherLANDISVILLE I: $1,350,000 · OtherCORAOPOLIS GARDENS: $1,161,510 · OtherWALNUT ST APTS: $1,080,000 · Other+6 more: $3,941,975 · Other+6 morePROJECT HOME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT HOME C…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $2,200,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S …CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $1,183,200 · Human ServicesCITY MISSION…LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $660,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIF…IMPACT HARRISBURG: $350,000 · Human ServicesIMPACT HARRI…1850 NORTH CROSKEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,000,000 · Housing & ShelterCARIBE TOWERS INC: $774,986 · Housing & ShelterEVANGELICAL SENIOR HOUSING: $411,975 · Housing & ShelterAmani Christian Comm Dev Corp: $900,000 · PhilanthropyREGIONAL HOUSING LEGAL SERVICES: $150,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$26,106,485Community Improvement$5,000,000Human Services$4,393,200Housing & Shelter$2,186,961Philanthropy$900,000Crime & Legal$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $2,200,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $1,183,200 over 1y, 30% of budgetEVANGELICAL SENIOR HOUSING: $411,975 over 1y, 47% of budgetIMPACT HARRISBURG: $350,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetREGIONAL HOUSING LEGAL SERVICES: $150,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family FoundationsPA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Commonwealth Cornerstone Group funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Commonwealth Cornerstone Group. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Commonwealth Cornerstone Group?

    Find your warmest path to Commonwealth Cornerstone Group through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Commonwealth Cornerstone Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph