Skip to content

Missouri · Public charity

Committee to Protect Missouri Families

To educate the public about the negative effects of the proposed right to work law in missouri.

$79k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
67%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$69k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$157k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations Committee to Protect Missouri Families funded were first-time grantees, receiving 95% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $360k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Youth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$69k60%
FY20243$380k67%
FY20234$141k100%
FY20221$25kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$364kPublic Benefit$110kCivil Rights$58kYouth Development$48kArts & Culture$25kReligion$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Strategic Victory Fund$350,00011%
Conservative Leadership for Missouri$100,000133%
Boys and Girls Club of St Charles County$47,50031%
Verite Communications$25,0001n/a
Equity Initiative Inc$25,000181%
NAACP St Louis County$25,0001n/a
Mayors Charity Ball Inc$14,00028%
Women Legislators of Missouri$10,0001n/a
Ecumenical Leadership Council$10,0001n/a
National Council of Jewish Women St Louis Section$7,50010%

Compare Committee to Protect Missouri Families with peer funders

About Committee to Protect Missouri Families

How much does Committee to Protect Missouri Families give?
Committee to Protect Missouri Families reported 5 itemized grants totaling $68,500, out of $79,100 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Committee to Protect Missouri Families fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (59%), Public Benefit (18%), Civil Rights (9%).
Who are Committee to Protect Missouri Families's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Strategic Victory Fund ($350k), Conservative Leadership for Missouri ($100k), Boys and Girls Club of St Charles County ($48k).
Does Committee to Protect Missouri Families fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Committee to Protect Missouri Families based?
Committee to Protect Missouri Families is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Committee to Protect Missouri Families’ filings →

More from the funding graph