Skip to content

North Carolina · Public charity

Committee on States

COMMITTEE ON STATES' mission is to create, nurture, & sustain a community of state-based progressive investors and institutional partners throughout the country.

$5.5M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
24
Grants FY2024
17
Organizations funded FY2023
35%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$115,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,325,000
Organizations funded a year
11 to 18
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
24
Total assets, FY2024
$1.9M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 35% of the organizations Committee on States funded were first-time grantees, receiving 39% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving24$5.5M25%
FY202317$970k35%
FY202218$900k44%
FY202111$504k64%
FY202012$495kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$5.4MCommunity Improvement$1.1MHealth$940kCivil Rights$430kHuman Services$280kArts & Culture$120kEnvironment$70kYouth Development$35k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Pa Alliance Action$1,375,00027%
Together Wisconsin Acts Inc$990,000217%
Michigan Civic Action Fund$990,00026%
Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc$405,00043%
Florida Advancement Project Inc$325,00035%
Project Nm LLC$310,0005n/a
Texas Future Cooperative$275,0005n/a
Ohio Progressive Collaborative$265,00022%
Nevada Alliance$265,00021%
Virginia Plus LLC$250,0005n/a
Show all 39 grantees
All grantees of Committee on States by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Pa Alliance Action$1,375,00027%
Together Wisconsin Acts Inc$990,000217%
Michigan Civic Action Fund$990,00026%
Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc$405,00043%
Florida Advancement Project Inc$325,00035%
Project Nm LLC$310,0005n/a
Texas Future Cooperative$275,0005n/a
Ohio Progressive Collaborative$265,00022%
Nevada Alliance$265,00021%
Virginia Plus LLC$250,0005n/a
Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc$248,750484%
Make North Carolina First$240,00032%
Tennessee Investor Fund$240,000214%
Washington Progress Alliance$240,000312%
Idaho Progressive Investor Network$220,0004n/a
Win Minnesota$165,00017%
A Better Big Sky$150,00033%
Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement$135,000311%
Colorado Democracy Alliance$115,000119%
New Hampshire Progress Alliance$100,00025%
Project 68 Inc$100,000114%
Alaska Progressive Donor Table$100,000213%
NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc$85,00020%
Maine Democracy Collaborative$85,0002n/a
Progressive Era Project$70,0002n/a
Oregon Donor Alliance$60,000116%
Instituto Lab$60,00024%
Missouri Win$50,00011%
Tides Advocacy$50,00010%
Florida Alliance$50,0001n/a
Wyoming Donor Alliance$50,000117%
Commonwealth Alliance Action Fund$50,00014%
Alliance for a Better North Dakota$50,000115%
Abundance Leadership Consulting LLC$35,0001n/a
Together Tennesse$35,0001n/a
See Forward Fund Inc$35,00013%
Alliance for a Better Utah Inc$35,000118%
The Alabama Alliance$35,000124%
Wyoming Investor Network$35,0001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Committee on States supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 29 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPa Alliance Action: $1,375,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetTogether Wisconsin Acts Inc: $990,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetMichigan Civic Action Fund: $990,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetGeorgia Investor Action Fund Inc: $405,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetFlorida Advancement Project Inc: $325,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetOhio Progressive Collaborative: $265,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNevada Alliance: $265,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetIndiana Progressive Collaborative Inc: $248,750 over 4y, 84% of budgetMake North Carolina First: $240,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTennessee Investor Fund: $240,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWashington Progress Alliance: $240,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetWin Minnesota: $165,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetA Better Big Sky: $150,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCommonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement: $135,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetColorado Democracy Alliance: $115,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetNew Hampshire Progress Alliance: $100,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetProject 68 Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAlaska Progressive Donor Table: $100,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc: $85,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOregon Donor Alliance: $60,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetInstituto Lab: $60,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMissouri Win: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTides Advocacy: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWyoming Donor Alliance: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCommonwealth Alliance Action Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetAlliance for a Better North Dakota: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSee Forward Fund Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAlliance for a Better Utah Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetThe Alabama Alliance: $35,000 over 1y, 24% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 29.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

State Engagement FundNC55.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: State Engagement Fund · State Leadership Project · Sixteen Thirty Fund · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Tides Advocacy · Strategic Victory Fund · Tides Foundation · North Fund · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · America Votes · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Fuse Washington

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Committee on States with peer funders

About Committee on States

How much does Committee on States give?
Committee on States reported 24 grants totaling $5,505,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 18 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Committee on States fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Public Benefit (64%), Community Improvement (13%), Health (11%).
Who are Committee on States's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Pa Alliance Action ($1.4M), Together Wisconsin Acts Inc ($990k), Michigan Civic Action Fund ($990k).
Does Committee on States fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 35% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Committee on States?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include State Engagement Fund, State Leadership Project, Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Where is Committee on States based?
Committee on States is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Committee on States’ filings →

More from the funding graph