How much did COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP grant in FY2024?

COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP reported 1 grants totaling $2,300,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP based?

COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP is based in IN.

COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP

The community education coalition (cec) is a partnership of education, business, and community stakeholders focused on aligning and integrating our community learning system, economic development, and quality of life.

$2.3M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$130k

Largest

01What you fund

0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$1.3MEmployment$272kPhilanthropy$120kCommunity Improvement$39kHuman Services$23kOther$410k

02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$130,000

Median grant

States reached

$37M

Total assets

Largest grants

IVY TECH FOUNDATION$130,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5M · 7 repeat orgs$649k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$649k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+50%

Still filing today

71%

55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

IT
IVY TECH FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +60%
RV
RIVER VALLEY RESOURCES
5× · 2017–2022 · $272k · revenue +6%
BC
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SCHOOL FOUNDATION
2× · 2019–2020 · $40k · revenue +23%

Funded once

INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $195k · revenue -7%
MC
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORP
one grant, 2017 · $149k
UW
UNITED WAY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

West Central Indiana Economic

Economic development, elderly services and transportation planning

Community Improvement

Indiana University Research & Technology

The indiana university research and technology corporation (iurtc) serves indiana university, the state of indiana, and the nation through creation and application of the university developed technologies and services, and the expanded…

Education

Institute for Workforce Excellence Inc

Dedicated to helping indiana attract, develop and retain hoosier talent needed to drive a highly skilled and equitable workforce.

Employment

University of Indianapolis

The mission of the University of Indianapolis is to prepare its graduates for effective membership in the societies in which they live and serve, and for excellence and leadership in their lives.

Education

Indiana Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

The foundation conducts studies, produces reports, and establishes initiatives to generate solutions to enhance indiana's economic future and quality of life.

Education

Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement

Intend Indiana Inc

Intend indiana advances comprehensive community development through innovative financing and development solutions that create and preserve affordable housing, support neighborhood revitalization efforts, and foster small business…

Housing & Shelter

Community Investment Fund of Indiana

The community investment fund of indiana finances projects to build vibrant communities and resilient families. we provide capital, make connections to the same, and facilitate access to program services for transformative community…

Community Improvement

Jay County Development Corporation

Encourage business to originate, expand current facilities, or relocate to areas within jay county, indiana, in order to expand job opportunities of the residents of jay county, indiana

—

Tri-County Workforce Investment

To provide local workforce investment systems in the counties of butler, armstrong, and indiana that increase the employment, retention, and earnings of participants, and increase occupational attainment of participants as governed by the…

Employment

City of Gary Economic Development Corporation

Gary EDC was formed to provide jobs within the City of Gary, IN, by pursuing business attraction, business expansion, and business retention.

Arts & Culture

Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc

Cicf is a catalyst for progress, and a supporter of visionary ideas with the power to improve our community and the lives of its residents.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is River Valley Resources Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indiana University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

9/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$1,301,951Other$410,308Employment$272,401Philanthropy$120,000Community Improvement$39,389Human Services$22,902

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cicp Foundation IncIN13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cicp Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SCHOOL FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 356041222 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SCHOOL FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Columbus Learning Center Management Corp?

Find your warmest path to Columbus Learning Center Management Corp through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Columbus Learning Center Management Corp?

More from the funding graph

COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Columbus Learning Center Management Corp?

More from the funding graph