· Private foundation
Columbus Door Company Private Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Miriam Hospital Foundation | $3,000 |
| Bradley Hospital Foundation | $3,000 |
| University of Rhode Island Foundation & Alumni Engagement | $2,500 |
| Rhode Island Hospital Foundation | $2,500 |
| Providence College-Angel Fund | $2,500 |
| Bombers Elite Softball | $2,500 |
| Kent Hospital Foundation | $2,500 |
| Rhode Island School of Design | $2,500 |
| Little Sisters of the Poor | $1,000 |
| Department of Human Services Neighbors Helping Neighbors | $300 |
| Tockwotten on The Waterfront | $250 |
| Cranston East Little League | $100 |
| Our Lady of Grace Church | $50 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMThe Miriam Hospital Foundation3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +225%
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +5%
Rhode Island Hospital Foundation3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- BHBRADLEY HOSPITALone grant, 2024 · $2k
- COCITY OF CRANSTON PARKSone grant, 2024 · $250
- FOFRIENDS OF THE WARWICK ANIMAL SHELTERgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $200 · revenue +128%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
NHF supports, encourages and coordinates the development of comprehensive, integrated health care-related services for the advancement and well-being of the community, in furtherance of the purposes of Newport Hospital (see Schedule O)
BUHF operates exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes, and more specifically, for the purpose of supporting and otherwise benefiting and being responsive to the needs of Brown University Health. (see Sched.O)
Delivering health with care.
As a member hospital in the Brown University Health system, EPBH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.
CMPI was organized to provide accountable patient-centered, high quality, efficient, value-based and innovative care to serve the health needs of the communities in Rhode Island and elsewhere. (see Schedule O)
As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, TMH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.
To be a proactive advocate for the hospitals in rhode island that is capable of working for and with the hospitals to positively influence public opinion, legislative outcomes and regulatory policy. the purpose of such advocacy is to…
The mission of women & infants corporation is to support the women & infants hospital of rhode island; a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, and affiliates. the hospital, a teaching hospital of the…
BHMG provides accountable patient-centered, high quality, efficient, value-based care to serve the health care needs of Rhode Islanders and others. BHMG's mission is: Delivering health with care.
As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.
The mission of women & infants development foundation is to serve the healthcare needs of our region through women & infants hospital of rhode island; a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, by…
CH-Franklin is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rhode Island Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Little League Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Miriam Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds Rhode Island Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds KENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE OF THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds Bradley Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WARWICK ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ida Ballou Littlefield Memorial Trust · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Columbus Door Company Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.