Skip to content

· Community foundation

Columbiana Community Foundation Inc

Charitable organization providing educational scholarships to graduates in the community and grants to other 501(c)(3) organizations for the benefit of the communities of columbiana and fairfield township.

$319k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$205kPublic Benefit$176kRecreation & Sports$146kCommunity Improvement$119kEducation$111kHuman Services$100kFood & Nutrition$66kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $297,820, the rows itemized in this filing. The $319,070 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $128k
$11,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$128,227
COLUMBIANA PROJECT PLAYGROUND$40,000
HEARTLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$20,000
CRESTVIEW EX SCHOOL DISTRICT$16,000
GRANTS EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN 5000$15,950
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF COLUMBIANA$12,432
MEALS ON WHEELS$11,700
VILLAGE OF NEW WATERFORD$10,000
THE WAY STATION INC$9,718
COLUMBIANA COUNTY ONE STOP$8,725
CLIPPER 12TH MAN$8,568
CITY OF COLUMBIANA$8,500
COLUMBIANA YOUTH BASEBALL INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HARMONY VILLAGE: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$1.4M
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+10%

Still filing today

31%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    The Way Station
    8× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +261%
  • CA
    COLUMBIANA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $96k · revenue +77% · 42% of their budget
  • CA
    COLUMBIANA AREA MEALS ON WHEELS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CB
    COLUMBIANA BOOSTER CLUB INC
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • CA
    COLUMBIANA AREA TOURISM BUREAU
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +13%
  • CS
    CRESTVIEW SOCCER BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -98% · 34% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia-Marion County Development Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
Columbus Chapel-Boalsburg Estate
—
3
Columbia Gorge Helping Hands

To collect and distribute food and related items to families and individuals

Food & Nutrition
4
Columbia Heights High School Alumni Scholarship Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Corbin Senior Citizens Inc

To provide various care services to senior citizens.

Human Services
6
Chamber of Commerce of Columbia Cou

To be the leading voice of business in coumbia county providing advocacy, promotion, and benefit solutions to its members.

—
7
Columbia Center Rotary Charity
—
8
Couloak Steelers
Recreation & Sports
9
Columbia Waterfront Park Foundation Inc
—
10
Columbiana County Agricultural Soci

County fair

Environment
11
Collin County Cornerstone Christian Academy

The organization operates a non-denominational school providing a christian environment for learning.

Education
12
Cornerstone Christian Academy

Child care focused on providing quality care in a christian environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbiana Area Tourism Bureau; the most unlike its peers is Crestview Soccer Boosters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF COLUMBIANA: $260,178 · OtherCITY OF COLUMBIANAIndividual grant recipient: $250,922 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOL EX SCHOOL DISTRICT: $104,228 · OtherCOL EX SCHOOL DISTRICTThe Way Station: $103,938 · OtherThe Way StationCOLUMBIANA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $95,877 · OtherCOLUMBIANA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEGRANTS LESS THAN 5000: $91,729 · OtherGRANTS LESS THAN 5000CRESTVIEW EX SCHOOL DISTRICT: $90,700 · OtherCRESTVIEW EX SCHOOL DISTRICTCROWN THEATER PRODUCTIONS: $64,250 · OtherGRANTS EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN 5000: $55,830 · OtherHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF COLUMBIANA AND FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP INC: $49,133 · OtherVILLAGE OF NEW WATERFORD: $46,410 · Other+4 more: $81,078 · Other+4 moreCOLUMBIANA AREA MEALS ON WHEELS: $77,850 · HealthColumbiana Project Playground Inc: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsCRESTVIEW SOCCER BOOSTERS: $8,225 · Recreation & SportsHEARTLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $55,847 · EducationCOLUMBIANA AREA TOURISM BUREAU: $15,860 · Community ImprovementHarmony Village Inc: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$1,294,273Health$77,850Recreation & Sports$58,225Education$55,847Community Improvement$15,860Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Way Station: $103,938 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetCOLUMBIANA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $95,877 over 4y, 42% of budgetCOLUMBIANA AREA MEALS ON WHEELS: $77,850 over 9y, 20% of budgetHEARTLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $55,847 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetColumbiana Project Playground Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCOLUMBIANA AREA TOURISM BUREAU: $15,860 over 1y, 10% of budgetCRESTVIEW SOCCER BOOSTERS: $8,225 over 1y, 34% of budgetHarmony Village Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Way Station ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIANA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIANA AREA MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Columbiana Project Playground Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIANA AREA TOURISM BUREAU ↗
  • Who funds CRESTVIEW SOCCER BOOSTERS ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Village Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Columbiana Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Columbiana Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Columbiana Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Columbiana Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Columbiana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph