Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Columbia Arms Inc

To liquidate the assets(less expenses) to other 501 (3)c non profit organization

$178k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$453kHuman Services$170kEducation$70kRecreation & Sports$50kInternational$20k
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $172,470 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $178,470 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL$40,000
SAYREVILLE ASSOC FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN$11,470
ST JUDE CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL$11,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$10,000
BROTHER'SBROTHER FOUNDATION$10,000
ST FRANCIS ACADEMY$10,000
THE SHARING PLACE$10,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
PATHWAYS TO INDEPENANCE$10,000
SHRINES HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$10,000
WHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATIN$10,000
WUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
DADDY'S SUNSHINE THE FIGHT AGANIST LUPUS$10,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS NJ STATE ORG$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 17%WUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 17%WUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 17%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENANCE: $10k → 14%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENANCE: $10k → 14%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENANCE: $10k → 14%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENANCE: $10k → 14%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENANCE: $10k → 14%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENANCE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$763k · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$763k
$0

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAYREVILLE ASSOCIATION FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +33%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +119%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +120%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

    Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

    Health
    2
    Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

    Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

    Health
    3
    Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

    Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

    Health
    4
    Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

    Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

    Health
    5
    Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

    Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

    Health
    6
    St Martin Hospital Inc

    To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

    Health
    7
    Saratoga Care Inc

    To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

    Health
    8
    Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

    Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

    Health
    9
    Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

    To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

    10
    SantaFe Healthcare Inc

    The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

    Health
    11
    Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

    The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

    12
    Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

    Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

    Health

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sayreville Association for Brain Injured Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    15/16
    Grantees still filing
    11/16
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW JERSEY CHAPTER INC — $110,000 · OtherLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW JERSEY C…DADDY'S SUNSHINE — $40,000 · OtherDADDY'S SUNSHINENEW JERSEY STATE ORGANIZATION OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS — $40,000 · OtherNEW JERSEY STATE ORGANIZATION OF CYSTIC …SHARING PLACE INC — $40,000 · OtherSHARING PLACE INCST FRANCIS ACADEMY — $20,000 · OtherST FRANCIS ACADEMYDADDY'S SUNSHINE THE FIGHT AGANIST LUPUS — $20,000 · OtherDADDY'S SUNSHINE THE FIGHT AGANIST LUPUSSAYREVILLE ASSOCIATION FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN — $62,100 · HealthSAYREVILLE ASSOCIATION FOR BRA…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $60,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRE…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $50,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCE…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INCPathways to Independence Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesPathways to Inde…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR …AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC — $61,000 · ReligionAMERICAN …WHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION — $20,000 · International
    Other$270,000Health$202,100Human Services$110,000Religion$61,000Arts & Culture$50,000Education$30,000Philanthropy$20,000International$20,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW JERSEY CHAPTER INC — $110,000 over 8y, 36% of budgetSAYREVILLE ASSOCIATION FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN — $62,100 over 8y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC — $61,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPathways to Independence Inc — $60,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY STATE ORGANIZATION OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS — $40,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA NEW JERSEY CHAPTER INC
    • Who funds SAYREVILLE ASSOCIATION FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN
    • Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC
    • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    • Who funds Pathways to Independence Inc
    • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    • Who funds WHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION
    • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    • Who funds NEW JERSEY STATE ORGANIZATION OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
    • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Columbia Arms Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
    • Pathways to Independence Inc36% of income from government
    • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
    • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Columbia Arms Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Columbia Arms Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $165k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph