Skip to content

· Public charity

Columbia Pacific Economic Developme

The COLUMBIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEnt district is to diversify and expand the economic base of the district by actively supporting existing businesses and promoting new business development.

$512k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$263k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Community Improvement$1.6MHuman Services$442kEducation$313kHealth$52kFood & Nutrition$50kRecreation & Sports$48kArts & Culture$31kCrime & Legal$29kOther$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $404,752, the rows itemized in this filing. The $511,895 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $107,143 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $141k
  • $250k+1 grant · $263k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST REGIONAL EDUCATION$263,394
SUNSET EMPIRE PARK & RECREATION FOU$25,000
ENCORE ACADEMY$25,000
BUMBLE PRESCHOOL AND CHILDCARE$25,000
COAST KIDS ACADEMY$20,000
LITTLE SEEDS NATURE SCHOOL LLC$16,000
LVE MEDIATION LLC$15,358
ASTORIA PLAYHOUSE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SCAPPOOSE SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 11%RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 4 repeat orgs$849k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
49

Total granted

$1.8M
$444k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+179%

Still filing today

25%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $405k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CLATSOP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +18% · 42% of their budget
  • EO
    EDC OF TILLAMOOK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $384k
  • CR
    COLUMBIA RIVER RECEPTION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $23k

Funded once

  • ET
    EL TAPATIO
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • CC
    COLUMBIA COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • DM
    D & M SOLTERO LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Cascades West Senior Services Foundation

To provide Assistance to Senior Citizen Programs

Human Services
2
Friends of Corvallis Parks and Recreation

Provide support for parks and recreational services in corvallis, oregon.

Recreation & Sports
3
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
4
Council On Aging & Human Services

Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.

Human Services
5
Southern Oregon Center for Community Partnerships

Prepare and deliver meals to the homes of older adults who are unable to shop or prepare meals due to illness, injury or disability. Meals are also available for eligible adults with disabilities. Also support disaster registry efforts to…

Human Services
6
Deschutes County Historical Society

Preserve, promote and celebrate our local history

—
7
Seabeck Community Center

Community education, recreation and fellowship.

Recreation & Sports
8
Storey County Senior Citizens Center

Community resources, programs and services.

Human Services
9
Four Rivers Welcome Center

The Welcome Center assists refugee immigrants in Malheur County to find the resources they need to build successful futures in our community.

Human Services
10
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
11
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
12
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clatsop Economic Development Resources; the most unlike its peers is St Helens Senior Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLATSOP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES: $1,401,172 · Community ImprovementCLATSOP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES+1 more: $10,000 · Community ImprovementEDC OF TILLAMOOK: $383,500 · OtherEDC OF TILLAMOOK+52 more: $554,640 · Other+52 moreNORTHWEST REGIONAL ESD FOUNDATION: $263,394 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST R…SUNSET EMPIRE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA COUNTY FAIR: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLUMBIA COUNTY CHILD ABUSE ASSESSM: $13,200 · Crime & LegalSCAPPOOSE SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $5,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$1,411,172Other$938,140Arts & Culture$263,394Recreation & Sports$25,000Youth Development$15,000Crime & Legal$13,200Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLATSOP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES: $1,401,172 over 2y, 42% of budgetSUNSET EMPIRE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetST HELENS SENIOR CENTER: $18,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA COUNTY FAIR: $15,000 over 1y, 98% of budgetCOLUMBIA COUNTY CHILD ABUSE ASSESSM: $13,200 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTurning Point Community Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetSCAPPOOSE SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLATSOP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST REGIONAL ESD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNSET EMPIRE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST HELENS SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF COLUMBIA COUNTY FAIR ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY CHILD ABUSE ASSESSM ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point Community Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR11.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Columbia Pacific Economic Developme funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Columbia Pacific Economic Developme. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • St Helens Senior Center: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Columbia Pacific Economic Developme’s filings →

More from the funding graph