Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Colossal Science Foundation Inc

Mission of this corporation shall be to save endangered wildlife and habitats through sustainable assurance populations, expanding education initiatives, and responsible land stewardship including contributions to institutions organized for the same or similar purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $3,879,218 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,669,627 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,790,409 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $563k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
$150,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$993k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL$1,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT$955,836
UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION$525,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$158,382
WILD$150,000
ROWAN UNIVERSITY$100,000
THE EXPLORERS CLUB$90,000
ELEPHANT HAVENS WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$65,000
AMERICAN HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
INTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $525k → 13%THE EXPLORERS CLUB: $90k → 17%ELEPHANT HAVENS WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $65k → 14%AMERICAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 14%MICANOPY ZOOLOGICAL PRESERVE: $300k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $956k → 11%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $158k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $1.8M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.7M · 95% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: DONATION - WILDLIFE HOSPITAL. · THE GIFT WILL BE AN ABSOLUTE GIFT TO THE UNIVERSITY AND WILL BE MADE WITHOUT IMPOSING ANY BINDING OBLIGATION OR TRUST ON THE UNIVERSITY. · TO PRESERVE AND RESTORE VICTORIAN GRASSLAND EARLESS DRAGONS THROUGH CAPTIVE BREEDING.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$95k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THE AWARD IS SPECIFICALLY TO COVER SALARY IN THE PERIOD 1/1-2025 TO 31/12-2025 AS PART OF A COLLABORATION INVESTIGATING GENETIC VARIATION OF THE EXTINCT AUROCHS AND QUAGGAS.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL — $1,500,000 · OtherHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT — $955,836 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUTIndividual grant recipient — $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROWAN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $525,000 · EducationUC SANTA CRUZ FOUND…THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $158,382 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNI…REWILD — $150,000 · AnimalsELEPHANT HAVENS WILDLIFE FOUNDATION — $65,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · AnimalsTHE EXPLORERS CLUB — $90,000 · Science & Tech
Other$2,855,836Education$683,382Animals$250,000Science & Tech$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $525,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $158,382 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREWILD — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EXPLORERS CLUB — $90,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetELEPHANT HAVENS WILDLIFE FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Colossal Science Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Colossal Science Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Colossal Science Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph