Skip to content

Colorado · Public charity

Colorado Womens Golf Association

None

$909k
Granted FY2017
4
Grants FY2017
4
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$52,059
Largest grant, FY2017
$837,439
States reached, FY2017
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Compare Colorado Womens Golf Association with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Colorado Womens Golf Association?

Find your warmest path to Colorado Womens Golf Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Colorado Womens Golf Association

How much does Colorado Womens Golf Association give?
Colorado Womens Golf Association reported 4 grants totaling $908,896 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Colorado Womens Golf Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (100%).
Who are Colorado Womens Golf Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Colorado Golf Association ($837k), Colorado Professional Golfers' Foundation Inc ($52k), Junior Golf Alliance of Colorado ($10k).
Where is Colorado Womens Golf Association based?
Colorado Womens Golf Association is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Colorado Womens Golf Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph