Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Colorado Hearing Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$247k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$803kEducation$589kHuman Services$110kRecreation & Sports$100kPhilanthropy$50kAnimals$18k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $191k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARION DOWNS CENTER - DENVER$100,000
HOPE SCHOOL SPOKANE$91,170
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$20,000
GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR HEARING LOSS IN CHILDREN$15,000
AMERICAN AUDITORY SOCIETY$11,500
COLORADO ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY$5,500
HANDS & VOICES OF SPOKANE$2,500
BELIZE AUDIOLOGY MISSION PROJECT$1,180
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR HEARING LOSS IN CHILDREN: $15k → 10%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $10k → 10%DEAF PLANET SOUL: $500 → 14%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $10k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG: $18k → 10%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $10k → 10%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $5k → 10%GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
OH
PA
NJ
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$408k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$314k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+24%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    4× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +42%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $101k · revenue +1% · 41% of their budget
  • MD
    MARION DOWNS CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $89k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $110k
  • AA
    AMER ACADEMY AUDIOLOGY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $102k
  • GU
    GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

The professional, scientific, and credentialing association for clinical and research based audiologists and speech-language pathologists. empowering and supporting speech-language pathologists, audiologists, and speech, language, and…

2
Starkey Hearing Foundation
Health
3
Listen and Talk

Listen and Talk teaches deaf and hard of hearing children to communicate and learn through listening and spoken language.

Education
4
Hearing Health Foundation

Hearing health foundation's mission is to prevent and cure hearing loss and tinnitus through groundbreaking research.

Health
5
Association of University Anesthesiologists

The mission of the aua is to promote excellence in academic anesthesiology through mentorship; promotion of diversity and inclusivity; and professional growth throughout the careers of educators, academic leaders, and researchers.

Health
6
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
7
American Academy of Audiology Inc

The american academy of audiology promotes quality hearing and balance care by advancing the profession of audiology through leadership, advocacy, education, public awareness, and support of research.

Community Improvement
8
Auditory Implant Initiative

The auditory implant initiative is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving access to high quality cochlear implant care through aggregate data analytics.

9
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
10
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
11
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
12
Center for Hearing and Communication

Provide high-quality, comprehensive services to empower people affected by hearing loss, deafness or listening challenges.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gallaudet University and the most unlike its peers is Deaf Planet Soul. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOPE SCHOOL (HEARING-ORAL PROGRAM OF EXCELLENCE) — $363,042 · OtherHOPE SCHOOL (HEARING-ORAL PROGRAM OF EXCELLENCE)AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY FDTN — $117,500 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY FDTNMARION DOWNS CENTER - DENVER — $110,000 · OtherMARION DOWNS CENTER - DENVERIndividual grant recipient — $110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMER ACADEMY AUDIOLOGY FOUNDATION — $101,500 · OtherAMER ACADEMY AUDIOLOGY FOUNDATIONHOPE SCHOOL SPOKANE — $91,170 · OtherHOPE SCHOOL SPOKANEMARION DOWNS CENTER — $89,200 · OtherMARION DOWNS CENTER+12 more — $140,280 · Other+12 moreChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $225,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Co…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY FOUNDATION — $100,500 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF AU…GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY — $23,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $20,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationVanderbilt University — $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS — $55,000 · Human ServicesPARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $17,500 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesInnovia Foundation — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY — $15,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,122,692Health$325,500Education$83,000Human Services$73,000Philanthropy$50,000Community Improvement$15,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $225,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY FOUNDATION — $100,500 over 2y, 41% of budgetMARION DOWNS CENTER — $89,200 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS — $55,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetInnovia Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY — $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $17,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOLORADO ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY — $15,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN AUDITORY SOCIETY — $12,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVanderbilt University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARION DOWNS CENTER
  • Who funds GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS
  • Who funds Innovia Foundation
  • Who funds GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARAGON SERVICE DOGS
  • Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY
  • Who funds AMERICAN AUDITORY SOCIETY
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DEAF PLANET SOUL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Colorado Hearing Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Colorado Hearing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Colorado Hearing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph