Skip to content
Colorado Fusion Soccer Club Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Colorado Fusion Soccer Club Inc

The colorado fusion soccer club provides an environment where young soccer players from diverse backgrounds are guided and inspired to reach their full potential both on and off the field.

$373k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
—
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Youth Development$161kScience & Tech$86kCrime & Legal$20kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $86,715, the rows itemized in this filing. The $372,902 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $286,187 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$10,783
Median grant
—
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEAM CRYSC 05B ECNL$20,757
TEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G BURGANDY$12,141
TEAM CRYSC 0304G ECNL$11,142
TEAM CRYSC 07G ENCL$10,783
TEAM CRYSC 08G ECNL$8,855
TEAM CRYSC NORTH 11B SELECT$8,399
TEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G SELECT$8,080
TEAM CRYSC NORTH 06 G SELECT$6,558
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 5 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$110k
$105k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G BURGANDY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $40k
  • TC
    TEAM CRYSC NORTH 06G SELECT
    3× · 2019–2021 · $24k
  • TC
    TEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G SELECT
    2× · 2019–2021 · $18k

Funded once

  • TC
    TEAM CRYSC 0102G ECNL
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • TC
    TEAM CRYSC 05B DA
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • TC
    TEAM CRYSC 03G ECNL
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2021.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2021, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G BURGANDY: $40,023 · OtherTEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G BURGANDYTEAM CRYSC NORTH 06G SELECT: $24,175 · OtherTEAM CRYSC NORTH 06G SELECTTEAM CRYSC 05B ECNL: $20,757 · OtherTEAM CRYSC 05B ECNLTEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G SELECT: $17,762 · OtherTEAM CRYSC NORTH 07G SELECTTEAM CRYSC SOUTH 04B SELECT: $17,368 · OtherTEAM CRYSC SOUTH 04B SELECTTEAM CRYSC 0102G ECNL: $12,709 · OtherTEAM CRYSC 05B DA: $12,211 · OtherTEAM CRYSC 03G ECNL: $11,364 · OtherTEAM CRYSC 0304G ECNL: $11,142 · OtherTEAM CRYSC 07G ENCL: $10,783 · OtherTEAM CRYSC SOUTH 07G SELECT: $10,264 · OtherTEAM CRYSC NORTH 07B SELECT: $9,750 · Other+11 more: $76,211 · Other+11 more
Other$274,519

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $384k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Colorado Fusion Soccer Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home