Skip to content

· Public charity

Coloradans for Progress

To research and distribute information to citizens concerning the general affordability of life, of the economy, and of the environment and advocating for workers and a strong jobs market in colorado.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $415k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$560k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
One Main Street Colorado$1,000,000
COLORADO AFFORDABILITY COALITION$461,729
COLORADO WORKS$433,016
COLORADO OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION$400,000
HERE COMES THE SUN$159,500
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CLEAN COLORADO FUTURE$55,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
COLORADO DAWN$50,000
COLORADANS FOR A STRONG TOMORROW$25,000
OUR COMMUNITY OUR FUTURE$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD LEADERSHIP ACTION: $50k → 10%COLORADO DAWN: $50k → 9%RESTORING STANDARDS: $100k → 10%COLORADO AFFORDABILITY COALITION: $462k → 12%One Main Street Colorado: $1.0M → 12%HERE COMES THE SUN: $160k → 13%OUR COMMUNITY OUR FUTURE: $10k → 10%COLORADO WORKS: $433k → 12%COLORADO OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION: $400k → 12%CLEAN COLORADO FUTURE: $55k → 12%COLORADANS FOR A STRONG TOMORROW: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Solar Energy Industries Assoc

Our mission is to expand solar and storage markets and to generate jobs and prosperity for the people of Colorado. Together with hundreds of solar and storage business members we work to advance clean energy policies, remove market…

—
2
Coloradans for Progress

To research and distribute information to citizens concerning the general affordability of life, of the economy, and of the environment and advocating for workers and a strong jobs market in colorado.

—
3
Colorado Rising State Action

The organization is focused on holding special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We're fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free…

—
4
Defend Colorado

The mission of the organization is to conduct research and analysis of conditions affecting the Colorado state economy and promote policies that strengthen the state economy.

—
5
Building a Better Colorado

To conduct research, promote community engagement, and provide an amalgamation of information to the citizens of colorado.

Community Improvement
6
Protect Colorados Vote

To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact

—
7
Colorado Energy Foundation

The Colorado Energy Foundation was incorporated in 2019 as a 501(c)(3) supporting organization of the Colorado Oil & Gas Association and seeks to amplify existing philanthropic efforts of the oil and gas industry in Colorado and develop…

Community Improvement
8
Unite for Colorado

To promote the common good and general welfare of americans by promoting public policy that strengthens the economy, promotes job growth, and supports fair and reasonable business regulations.

—
9
Colorado Ag Water Alliance

Works with farmers and ranchers to address water issues around the state impacting agriculture.

Environment
10
Climate Jobs Colorado Inc

Educate the public and affiliate organization members regarding environmental policy and the ability to create good jobs through new energy projects, better transit and transportation systems, improved building practices, enhanced…

Environment
11
Protecting Colorados Environment Economy and Energy Independence

To educate the public about responsible fracking practices and energy development and urging voters to reject state wide ballot initiatives banning enegry development and to support initiatives that promote responsible energy development.

—
12
Colorado Association for Recycling Inc

Recycling education and awareness.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Affordability Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Clean Colorado Future. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
0/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Colorado Affordability Coalition: $461,729 · OtherColorado Affordability CoalitionColorado Works: $433,016 · OtherColorado WorksColorado Oil & Gas Association: $400,000 · OtherColorado Oil & Gas AssociationHere Comes the Sun: $159,500 · OtherHere Comes the SunIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+4 more: $140,000 · Other+4 moreOne Main Street Colorado: $1,000,000 · Public BenefitOne Main Street ColoradoCOLORADO DAWN: $50,000 · Education
Other$1,694,245Public Benefit$1,000,000Education$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOne Main Street Colorado: $1,000,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetColorado Affordability Coalition: $461,729 over 1y, 100% of budgetColorado Works: $433,016 over 1y, 100% of budgetColorado Oil & Gas Association: $400,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHere Comes the Sun: $159,500 over 1y, 68% of budgetClean Colorado Future: $55,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetCOLORADO DAWN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOUR COMMUNITY OUR FUTURE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coloradans for Progress funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coloradans for Progress. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coloradans for Progress’ filings →

    More from the funding graph