Skip to content

· Private foundation

Collins Fisher Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$221k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$565kPhilanthropy$297kHealth$102kEducation$83kHuman Services$48kEmployment$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k14 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE$150,000
BAYLOR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION$10,000
SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
UPLIFT EDUCATION$8,500
THE FAMILY PLACE$8,000
BEHIND EVERY DOOR$6,600
THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL$5,500
THE THOMAS DYE SCHOOL$5,000
SOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION$4,000
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$3,000
YALE CLUB OF DALLAS$3,000
CIRCLE OF CHILDREN PRESCHOOL$3,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$1,000
WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL$1,000
SAINT ALBANS SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $7k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $7k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $7k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $3k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $3k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $8k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $8k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MA
NJ
CA
WV
VA
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$825k · 19 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$825k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+37%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $550k · revenue +30%
  • SJ
    SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $43k · revenue +14%
  • BH
    Baylor Health Care System Foundation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CARY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • DC
    DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +20%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
12
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Goodwill Industries of South Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
17/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $550,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $297,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEX…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropySAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $43,440 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $40,000 · HealthGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $20,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherYALE CLUB OF DALLAS: $12,000 · OtherTHE JOHN THOMAS DYE SCHOOL: $9,500 · OtherCIRCLE OF CHILDREN PRESCHOOL: $4,500 · Other+10 more: $16,500 · OtherUPLIFT EDUCATION: $26,000 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $25,800 · EducationSouthern Methodist University: $11,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,200 · Education+1 more: $600 · EducationBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $21,250 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $2,500 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Arts & Culture$550,250Philanthropy$297,500Health$83,440Other$81,500Education$66,600Human Services$48,750Public Safety & Disaster$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $550,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $297,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $43,440 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $25,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe Family Place: $21,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHN THOMAS DYE SCHOOL: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEEDLEPOINT GUILD INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN THOMAS DYE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEEDLEPOINT GUILD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Collins Fisher Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Collins Fisher Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Collins Fisher’s filings →

More from the funding graph