Skip to content

· Private foundation

Coleman Resid Tw

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$104kEnvironment$88kScience & Tech$81kFood & Nutrition$79kRecreation & Sports$65kCommunity Improvement$57kEducation$55kAnimals$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$30,000
SPRUCE HILL COMMUNITY TRUST$24,500
UNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT$20,000
BOSTON HARBOR NOW$20,000
3RD STREET ALLIANCE$12,069
GOUCHER COLLEGE$7,500
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$6,000
WRIGHT LOCKE FARM CONSERVANCY$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$5,000
INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS$5,000
COUNCIL OF SOCIAL CONCERN$5,000
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$4,000
WINCHESTER FARMERS$3,500
INATURALIST$3,000
THE JED FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YW BOSTON: $1k → 16%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Coleman Resid Tw’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Coleman Resid Twlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$593k · 36 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
42

Total granted

$593k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+61%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +68%
  • BOSTON HARBOR NOW INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +286%
  • BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $42k · revenue ×15

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTH PHILLY COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • C3
    CHOSEN 300 MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -17%
  • TG
    THE GRIFFIN MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
3
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
8
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
9
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Part of the Solution; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/47
Grantees still filing
29/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODS HOLE OCENOGRAPHIC INSTIT: $61,000 · OtherWOODS HOLE OCENOGRAPHIC INSTITTHOMPSON ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND: $60,000 · OtherTHOMPSON ISLAND OUTWARD BOUNDWRIGHT LOCKE FARM: $17,500 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherCAMBRIDGE CHILDREN'S CARE: $15,500 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $34,500 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCHumane World for Animals International: $25,000 · OtherHumane World for Animals International+56 more: $203,694 · Other+56 moreBOSTON HARBOR NOW INC: $42,500 · EnvironmentBOSTON HARB…WRIGHT-LOCKE FARM CONSERVANCY INC: $26,625 · EnvironmentWRIGHT-LOCK…WILDFLOWER DONOR INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentWILDFLOWER …INATURALIST: $3,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,250 · EnvironmentWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $74,750 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE…BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $42,000 · Food & NutritionPART OF THE SOLUTION: $11,000 · Food & NutritionWilliams College: $15,000 · EducationGOUCHER COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationPREP FOR PREP: $7,250 · EducationCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $7,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $5,000 · EducationTREE HOUSE BOOKS: $4,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $2,500 · EducationSPRUCE HILL COMMUNITY TRUST: $24,500 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT: $20,000 · Community ImprovementPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $32,500 · HealthSAMARITANS INC: $5,500 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · Health
Other$432,694Environment$80,375Science & Tech$74,750Food & Nutrition$53,000Education$50,250Community Improvement$44,500Health$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $74,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON HARBOR NOW INC: $42,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $42,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $34,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWRIGHT-LOCKE FARM CONSERVANCY INC: $26,625 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWilliams College: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWoburn Council of Social Concern Inc: $9,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $8,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Philanthropy Connection Inc: $7,875 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP: $7,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHOSEN 300 MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTREE HOUSE BOOKS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWEAVERS WAY COMMUNITY PROGRAMS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWINCHESTER SENIORS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF WOMEN REACH AND TEACH ACROSS BORDERS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetINATURALIST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ANNE NURSERY KINDERGARTEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA FOR UNFPA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF BOSTON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON HARBOR NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WRIGHT-LOCKE FARM CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗
  • Who funds SPRUCE HILL COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds Woburn Council of Social Concern Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Philanthropy Connection Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
  • Who funds WILDFLOWER DONOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CHOSEN 300 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITANS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Philadelphia Tennis Club ↗
  • Who funds XERCES SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coleman FoundationPA30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coleman Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coleman Resid Tw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coleman Resid Tw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Boston Harbor Now Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Samaritans Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Boston Area Gleaners Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Winchester Seniors Association Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coleman Resid Tw?

Find your warmest path to Coleman Resid Tw through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coleman Resid Tw’s filings →

More from the funding graph