Skip to content

· Private foundation

Coleman Foundation for Cultural

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$35kEducation$27kYouth Development$26kCrime & Legal$18kArts & Culture$12kAnimals$8kHealth$3kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$1,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$344k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$17,500
ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC$16,500
FUREVER FURKIDZ ANIMAL RESCUE$1,750
GIRLS WITH SOLE$1,500
CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA$1,200
UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION$1,000
JIN HUO COMMUNITY INC$1,000
GIRLS SCOUTS OF NE OHIO$1,000
DYLAN'S HOUSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JIN HUO COMMUNITY INC: $2k → 13%JIN HUO COMMUNITY INC: $1k → 13%JIN HUO COMMUNITY INC: $1k → 13%GIRLS WITH SOLE: $2k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $17k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $5k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $4k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $3k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $2k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 11 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$106k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+465%

Still filing today

55%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +41%
  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +20%
  • TM
    The Musical Arts Association
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • CD
    CHAGRIN DOCUMENTARY FILM FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • PU
    POKROVA UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation

Asian university for women (auw) seeks to offer high quality education to young women of extraordinary talents drawn from diverse national, ethnic, religious, and socio-economic backgrounds. see schedule o for continuation.it is open to…

Education
2
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
3
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
4
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Gesher Human Services

Gesher human services is a bridge to hope and opportunity for people at work, at home, and in the community. gesher's workforce development, behavioral health, and inclusion programming serves all metro detroiters while meeting the needs…

Employment
7
Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland

Moca's mission- art now, in progress - embodies our nature as a living, adaptive platform for artistic experimentation, public exchange, and civic connection. our vision - artists & art lead us to the unfamiliar, where we open and connect…

Arts & Culture
8
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
9
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
10
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
11
Theater Mu Incorporated

Theater mu produces great performances born of arts, equity, and justice from the heart of the asian american experience.

Arts & Culture
12
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Services in Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Future Vision Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRLS SCOUTS OF NE OHIO: $25,500 · OtherGIRLS SCOUTS OF NE OHIOKENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,500 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFUREVER FURKIDZ ANIMAL RESCUE: $6,600 · OtherFUREVER FURKIDZ ANIMAL RESCUE+9 more: $9,550 · Other+9 moreASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $30,100 · Human ServicesASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INCJIN HUO COMMUNITY INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesJIN HUO COMMUNITY INCGirls With Sole: $1,500 · Human ServicesFUTURE VISION FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts Association: $4,600 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Mount Union: $6,000 · EducationTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $925 · EducationDYLAN'S HOUSE: $2,000 · HealthTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE: $500 · Employment
Other$79,650Human Services$35,100Arts & Culture$10,100Education$6,925Health$2,000Employment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $30,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE VISION FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $4,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJIN HUO COMMUNITY INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDYLAN'S HOUSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $925 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE VISION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds JIN HUO COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds DYLAN'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Girls With Sole ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coleman Foundation for Cultural funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coleman Foundation for Cultural. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Coleman Foundation for Cultural?

    Find your warmest path to Coleman Foundation for Cultural through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coleman Foundation for Cultural’s filings →

    More from the funding graph