Skip to content

· Private foundation

Coldwater Multiple Donations Softball Tournament

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$196kRecreation & Sports$20kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$6kHuman Services$6kFood & Nutrition$5kReligion$500
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$8,200
Individual grant recipient$7,700
Individual grant recipient$7,700
Individual grant recipient$7,700
Individual grant recipient$7,700
Individual grant recipient$7,700
Individual grant recipient$5,200
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION$3,000
CANCER ASSOCIATION OF MERCER COUNTY$3,000
COLDWATER SCOUT TROOP 96$600
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MERCER COUNTY HOUSE OF HOPE: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 6 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
32

Total granted

$63k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-7%

Still filing today

50%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CANCER ASSOCIATION OF MERCER COUNTY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +36%
  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +1%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT
    3× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • MM
    MOLLY MILLER FAMILY
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercer County Family Crisis Center

The organization is dedicated to breaking the cycle of domestic violence and building a community free of abuse. the mission of the organization is to support and respond to the needs of survivors of violence and/or abuse as well as their…

Human Services
2
Womens Center of Mercer County

Assist and help women and children in crisis by providing shelter and assistance, promote stability, dignity, & self-reliance.

Human Services
3
Operation Compassion of Mercer County Inc

Provide community support to citizens of mercer and surrounding counties. primarily provide meals and groceries to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
4
Marco Dementia Respite Mdr Inc

Developing and providing supportive, stimulating, educational, and clinical services for individuals with early stage Alzheimer's and dementia, their caregivers, and other adults in need. Mission is to enhance quality of life through…

Health
5
Rachel's House

Psychosocial rehabilitation

Health
6
Holt Street Miracle Center

A community based recovery center that provides transitional and long term housng to our vecterans, ex-offendrs and those who are coming from drug additon programs needing housng

Human Services
7
The Metanoia Project

To provide food, clothing, shelter, shower and resources to homeless men & women of cleveland.

Housing & Shelter
8
Margie's Haven House Inc

To provide aid for victims of abuse

—
9
The Bridge Trust

Residence for developmentally disabled women providing a community based intermediate care facility

—
10
The Helen R Tucker Dev Center Inc

Day training and resident services for mentally and phjysically handicapped adults

Human Services
11
Bay Home Inc

Care of developmentally disabled adults.

Philanthropy
12
Hope House of Scott County

Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arc of Ohio in Mercer County; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $15,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,750 · OtherMOLLY MILLER FAMILY: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherREID RANLY FAMILY: $8,000 · OtherMATT HOUSE: $8,000 · OtherISAAC RNDALL FAMILY: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · Other+25 more: $65,450 · Other+25 moreCANCER ASSOCIATION OF MERCER COUNTY: $22,000 · HealthCANCER ASSOCIATION…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $16,250 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY…+1 more: $500 · HealthHAND-UP VILLAGE INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF HOPE: $5,500 · Human ServicesRUSTIC HOPE INC: $250 · Religion
Other$193,100Health$38,750Housing & Shelter$6,000Human Services$5,500Religion$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER ASSOCIATION OF MERCER COUNTY: $22,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $16,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAND-UP VILLAGE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT: $5,750 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE: $5,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMAV YOUTH MENTORING INC: $4,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetARC OF OHIO IN MERCER COUNTY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUSTIC HOPE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER ASSOCIATION OF MERCER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAND-UP VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MAV YOUTH MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF OHIO IN MERCER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coldwater Multiple Donations Softball Tournament funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coldwater Multiple Donations Softball Tournament. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Coldwater Multiple Donations Softball Tournament?

    Find your warmest path to Coldwater Multiple Donations Softball Tournament through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coldwater Multiple Donations Softball Tournament’s filings →

    More from the funding graph