Skip to content
Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$997kReligion$472kCivil Rights$7kEnvironment$7kArts & Culture$7kEducation$3kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$3,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
U T A Of Monsey$15,800
Bnos Zion Of Bobov$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,600
Bnos Sanz$6,900
Toldos Yakov Yosef Inc$5,000
Yeshiva Oholei Shem Dnitra$4,500
Yeshiva Nachlas Hatorah Of Krula$4,000
KUPAS EZRAH SHOMRIE CHESED$4,000
American Friends of Sharai Daas$3,800
MEOR YITZCHOK INC$3,600
Talmud Torah Ohr Moishe$3,000
Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov$3,000
U T A Of Boro Park$3,000
Cong Ahavas Tzedokah Vchesed$2,100
Mosdos Bnei Zion$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%U T A Of Monsey: $21k → 14%Yeshiva Shaar Yerushalaym Inc: $15k → 14%Nachlat Yehoshua: $20k → 17%Ach Tov V'chesed: $10k → 20%Cong Diverei Dhloime Bobov: $250k → 10%Yeshiva Pirchei Shoshonim: $18k → 11%U T A Of Monsey: $16k → 14%Yeshiva of Kasho: $5k → 20%U T A Of Monsey: $10k → 14%Ach Tov V'chesed: $5k → 20%MEOR YITZCHOK INC: $10k → 14%Nachlas Yehoshua: $10k → 20%U T A Of Monsey: $10k → 14%Nachlas Yehoshua: $5k → 20%U T A Of Monsey: $9k → 14%ELEF HAMUGIEN: $5k → 20%MEOR YITZCHOK INC: $7k → 14%Mosdos Sanz Klausenburg of Monsey: $7k → 14%Mosdos Sanz Klausenburg of Monsey: $6k → 14%CONGREGATION BOBOVER YESHIVA OFMONSEY: $6k → 14%KUPAS EZRAH SHOMRIE CHESED: $6k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $277k → 14%BOBOVER YESHIVAH BNEI ZION: $25k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $195k → 14%Bnos Zion Of Bobov: $18k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $178k → 14%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $17k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $97k → 14%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $16k → 20%YESHIVA TZOIN YOSEF PUPA INC: $15k → 14%Mishkan Yecheskel: $14k → 20%Cong Tov Lkol: $10k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $10k → 20%KHAL UNGVAR DBA MISHNE HALACHOTH GEDOLOTH: $10k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $10k → 20%Bnos Zion Of Bobov: $10k → 20%Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $10k → 20%Mishkan Yecheskel: $10k → 20%Mishkan Yecheskel: $10k → 20%KEDUSHAT ZION: $8k → 20%Mosdos Satmar BP Inc: $7k → 20%Congregation Rachmestrivka: $6k → 20%Bayis Esther: $5k → 20%cong machne Chaim: $10k → 20%Bnos Sanz: $7k → 20%Talmud Torah Ohr Moishe: $5k → 20%Toldos Yakov Yosef Inc: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE: $20k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 22 repeat orgs$475k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
36

Total granted

$1.1M
$449k

Still filing today

0%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
    4× · 2017–2020 · $747k
  • UT
    U T A Of Monsey
    4× · 2021–2025 · $66k
  • KZ
    Kollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov
    4× · 2021–2025 · $66k

Funded once

  • CD
    Cong Diverei Dhloime Bobov
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • BY
    BOBOVER YESHIVAH BNEI ZION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CY
    CONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $747,465 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTCong Diverei Dhloime Bobov: $250,000 · OtherCong Diverei Dhloime BobovU T A Of Monsey: $66,200 · OtherKollel Zichron Chaim D'bobov: $66,000 · Other+59 more: $474,900 · Other+59 moreBNEI MORDECHAI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHABIRA INC: $500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $100 · Religion
Other$1,604,565Philanthropy$2,500Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundBirkas Rosh Foundatio…Sdei Israel Foundatio…B&M Steinmetz Foundat…S&W Foundation IncYms Foundation IncChavie Stern Family F…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Chayim V ChesedAmerican Friends of B…Ani Mamin FoundationZichron Simcha Dsassov
The Ojc FundNY62.9× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc · Sdei Israel Foundation Inc · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · S&W Foundation Inc · Yms Foundation Inc · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Ani Mamin Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cohen Ld Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home