Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cogitandum Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$197kEnvironment$180kReligion$116kPhilanthropy$51kHuman Services$43kEducation$13kHealth$7kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $89k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCENIC HUDSON$45,000
HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE$30,000
BRIARCLIFF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$14,000
NEIGHBORS LINK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GO SEE FOUNDATION$5,000
SING SING PRISON MUSEUM$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION$2,500
WNET FOR FIRING LINE$2,500
REHABILITATION THROUGH THE ARTS$1,500
NEW BEGINNINGS$1,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC$1,500
NEIGHBORS FOR REFUGEES$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE BRIARCLIFF MANOR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEIGHBORS LINK: $5k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $5k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $5k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $3k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $1k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $150 → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $500 → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $500 → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $500 → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $500 → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $500 → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 9%OSSINING PADRES HISPANOS: $1k → 9%OSSINING PADRES HISPANOS: $1k → 9%OSSINING PADRES HISPANOS: $1k → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$612k · 36 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
18

Total granted

$612k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+44%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Scenic Hudson Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $166k · revenue +66%
  • HV
    HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $147k · revenue +330%
  • NL
    NEIGHBORS LINK CORP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • SP
    SCARBOROUGH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • RM
    ROCKWELL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • GH
    GULLOTTA HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…

Environment
2
Federated Conservationists of Westchester County Inc

None

—
3
Catskill Center for Conservation & Development Inc

The Catskill Center for Conservation and Development, Inc. (the Catskill Center) is a not-for-profit organization under the non-profit laws of the State of New York. The mission of the Catskill Center is to preserve and enrich the…

Environment
4
Woodstock Land Conservancy Inc

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment
5
The Historical Society of Rockland

The Historical Society of Rockland County is a museum and educational organization dedicated to engaging diverse audiences in a dynamic dialogue about the rich historical heritage of the county.

—
6
Artswestchester Inc

Artswestchester's mission is to create an equitable, inclusive, vibrant and sustainable westchester county in which the arts are integral to and integrated into every facet of life.

Arts & Culture
7
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
8
Riverkeeper Inc

Protects and restores the hudson river from source to sea and safeguards drinking water supplies.

Environment
9
White Plains Performing Arts Center

Productions

Arts & Culture
10
Wallkill Valley Land Trust

To promote the preservation, protection, and balanced use of the wallkill valley through acquisition, holding, and management of fee simple title conservation easements.

—
11
Friends of Hudson River Park Inc

Fundraising, marketing and communication and public policy for the hudson river park.

Recreation & Sports
12
Upper Hudson Northern Catskill Natural Resource Trust Inc

To hold and manage open space property for the public's benefit and assist in the preservation and stewardship of the scenic beauty, natural communities and recreational amenities in greene county, ny and surrounding areas.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hudson River Museum of Westchester; the most unlike its peers is Ezra Jack Keats Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $146,800 · Arts & CultureHUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL …JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $17,650 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INCWNET: $13,500 · Arts & CultureWNETSING SING PRISON MUSEUM: $13,000 · Arts & CultureSING SING PRISON MUSEUM+5 more: $6,000 · Arts & CultureBRIARCLIFF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $108,200 · OtherBRIARCLIFF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHGO SEE FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherGO SEE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE OSSINING MICRO FUND INC: $8,000 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS: $7,500 · OtherOPEN DOOR INC: $7,000 · Other+31 more: $41,960 · Other+31 moreScenic Hudson Inc: $166,000 · EnvironmentScenic Hudson IncNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $18,650 · Human ServicesOssining Padres Hispanos: $3,000 · Human ServicesOssining Food Pantry: $2,500 · Human ServicesWESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $2,010 · Human ServicesTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC: $14,000 · Public BenefitGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $3,600 · Public BenefitGULLOTTA HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Public BenefitTrustees of Dartmouth College: $5,000 · EducationOSSINING MATTERS INC: $3,000 · EducationTHE OSSINING LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC: $6,500 · HealthOSSINING VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $750 · Health
Arts & Culture$196,950Other$207,160Environment$166,000Human Services$28,660Public Benefit$18,600Education$10,500Health$7,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $166,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $146,800 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $18,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $17,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSING SING PRISON MUSEUM: $13,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $3,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOssining Padres Hispanos: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOssining Food Pantry: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OSSINING LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $2,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY ARTS COMMUNITY INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGULLOTTA HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEIGHBORS FOR REFUGEES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEZRA JACK KEATS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTINES CRITTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUDSON RIVER MUSEUM OF WESTCHESTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM AT STOCKBRIDGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSSINING VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds SING SING PRISON MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds MEDIATORS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OSSINING MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ossining Padres Hispanos ↗
  • Who funds Ossining Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds THE OSSINING LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY ARTS COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds REHABILITATION THROUGH THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds GULLOTTA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS FOR REFUGEES INC ↗
  • Who funds EZRA JACK KEATS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hudson Road Foundation IncNY26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hudson Road Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Chapman Family Foundation · The Van Steen Foundation · St Faith's House Foundation · Yvonne & Leslie Pollack Family Foundation Inc · David Swope Fund U Art VIII of Rev Tr Dtd July 25 2017 · Dede Emerson Foundation Inc · Phelps Community Foundation Inc · Pilzer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cogitandum Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cogitandum Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Norman Rockwell Museum at Stockbridge Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cogitandum Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cogitandum Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cogitandum’s filings →

More from the funding graph