· Public charity
Coastal Quest
Coastal Quest (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization working collaboratively with partners to build resilient coastal communities in California.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $445,455 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $460,456 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,001 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $208k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $183k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| California Academy of Science | $70,000 |
| Ctr for Environ Econ Develop | $60,000 |
| Sustainable Solano | $52,500 |
| Wishtoyo Chumash Foundation | $40,000 |
| Color the Water | $30,000 |
| Green Cities Fund | $30,000 |
| Cal Marine Sanctuary Fdn | $28,000 |
| Nature Collective | $22,478 |
| Orange County Coastkeeper | $21,028 |
| Monterey Coastkeeper | $16,796 |
| Greater Farallones Assoc | $10,000 |
| Crystal Cove Conservancy | $10,000 |
| Laguna Canyon Foundation | $7,500 |
| International Bird Rescue | $7,000 |
| Siuslaw Watershed Council | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCALIFORNIA MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2024 · $155k · revenue +190%
- CACALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES3× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +4%
- SSSUSTAINABLE SOLANO INC2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- NMNATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $39k · revenue +200%
- SMSANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $34k · revenue +124%
- CECOASTAL ECOSYSTEMS INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIAone grant, 2018 · $24k · revenue -98%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation works with diverse groups representing many interests to acquire and restore critical wildlife habitat and protecting species
Organization was able to support efforts for the protection and sustainability of the unique pacific coast environments
The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.
Provide scientific support and tools for decision making and communication through collaborative efforts.
Save Oceanside Sand is a group of local activists dedicated to restoring and preserving the beaches of Oceanside, California. Working with local, regional, state, and federal authorities, our mission is to protect this vital resource by…
Protecting and promoting the marine biodiversity of Hawai'i through coral restoration, ecological monitoring, regenerative tourism, and cultural integration
To mobilize people in local communities around the world to protect marine wildlife and the oceans and inland watersheds that sustain them.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save Our Shores and the most unlike its peers is Color the Water. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds NATURE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds WISHTOYO FOUNDATION DBA WISHTOYO CHUMASH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE SOLANO INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN CITIES FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COLOR THE WATER ↗
- Who funds BAY FOUNDATION OF MORRO BAY ↗
- Who funds Orange County Coastkeeper ↗
- Who funds CRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Monterey Coastkeeper ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILDCOAST ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR SHORES ↗
- Who funds SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Los Cerritos Wetlands Fund ↗
- Who funds OCEANS UNMANNED INC ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER FARALLONES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA CANYON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DUNES ↗
- Who funds ALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds OCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance ↗
- Who funds SIUSLAW WATERSHED COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE ↗
- Who funds NORTON BAY INTER-TRIBAL WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Resources Legacy Fund · Patagoniaorg · The Marisla Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Environment Now · Dorrance Family Foundation · The Rose Foundation for Communities the Environment · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Coastal Quest funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Siuslaw Watershed Council Inc — 100% of income from government
- National Marine Sanctuary Foundation — 88% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Coastal Quest?
Find your warmest path to Coastal Quest through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.