Skip to content

· Public charity

Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and

CNHED has achieved successes that combines effective advocacy, policy making, public education, capacity building, information and analysis, and engages members and allies in a practical manner to help ensure that low-income residents have housing and economic opportunities.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$4.1M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $663k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.3M
$180,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Local Initiatives Support Corporati$2,000,000
Rebuilding Together DC Alexandria$927,070
Usource Consulting LLC$350,000
Angel Contracting Services$245,005
East Capitol St Development LLC$180,000
1302 East Capitol Street NE LLC$99,850
1 Regal Enterprise LLC$80,325
Housing Counseling Services Inc$57,500
First Choice Construction Inc$47,290
G A Malcolm Investments LLC$33,670
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Local Initiatives Support Corporati: $2.0M → 17%1302 East Capitol Street NE LLC: $100k → 14%1302 East Capitol Street NE LLC: $50k → 14%Angel Contracting Services: $245k → 14%Housing Counseling Services Inc: $58k → 14%Housing Counseling Services Inc: $38k → 14%Usource Consulting LLC: $350k → 14%East Capitol St Development LLC: $180k → 14%1 Regal Enterprise LLC: $80k → 14%First Choice Construction Inc: $47k → 14%Rebuilding Together DC Alexandria: $927k → 14%G A Malcolm Investments LLC: $34k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rebuilding Together DC Alexandria: $927,070 · OtherRebuilding Together DC AlexandriaUsource Consulting LLC: $350,000 · OtherUsource Consulting LLCEast Capitol St Development LLC: $279,850 · OtherEast Capitol St Development LLCAngel Contracting Services: $245,005 · OtherAngel Contracting Services1 Regal Enterprise LLC: $80,325 · Other+3 more: $130,960 · Other+3 moreLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $2,000,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATIONHOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $95,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,013,210Community Improvement$2,000,000Housing & Shelter$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together DC Alexandria ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and’s filings →

    More from the funding graph