Skip to content
Coalition for National Trauma Research at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Coalition for National Trauma Research

To enhance trauma research in the U.S.

$459k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$157k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$8.1MEducation$56k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $364k
$21,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Washington$156,930
University of Maryland$78,231
John Hopkins University$76,847
Vanderbilt University Medical Center$51,684
University of Pennsylvania$21,000
University of Alabama$19,985
US Army Institute of Surgical Research$14,661
Christiana Care Health Services Inc$13,462
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston$12,056
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio$11,032
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Brigham and Women's Hospital: $180k → 16%Stanford University: $108k → 8%UC San Diego Health: $108k → 11%The Regents of the University of California Davis: $55k → 12%University of California Los Angeles: $206k → 14%University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston: $230k → 16%The Medical College of Wisconsin: $55k → 17%Oregon Health & Science Univeristy: $229k → 12%Office of the Chief Medical Examiner: $52k → 11%Vanderbilt University Medical Center: $52k → 14%University of Utah: $49k → 8%Denver Health and Hospital Authority: $237k → 12%University of Washington: $222k → 9%Johns Hopkins University: $330k → 19%The Brigham and Womens Hospital: $176k → 16%Stanford University: $43k → 8%UC San Diego Health: $93k → 11%University of Southern California: $36k → 14%University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston: $220k → 16%Medical College of Wisconsin: $48k → 17%Oregon Health & Science University: $124k → 12%Denver Health and Hospital Authority: $170k → 12%University of Washington: $194k → 9%Johns Hopkins University: $304k → 19%Stanford University: $44k → 8%UC San Diego Health: $56k → 11%University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio: $184k → 16%Oregon Health & Science University: $94k → 12%University of Washington: $157k → 9%Johns Hopkins University: $289k → 19%Brigham and Womens Hospital: $131k → 16%Stanford University: $43k → 8%UC San Diego Health: $55k → 11%University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio: $103k → 16%University of Washington: $118k → 9%Johns Hopkis Uiversity: $198k → 19%University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio: $37k → 16%University of Washington: $117k → 9%John Hopkins University: $115k → 19%University of Washington: $96k → 9%Maryland Medical Legal Foundation: $92k → 19%John Hopkins University: $77k → 19%University of Maryland: $92k → 19%University of Maryland: $91k → 19%University of Maryland: $78k → 19%University of Maryland: $67k → 19%University of Maryland: $64k → 19%University of Maryland: $43k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 29 repeat orgs$467k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
8

Total granted

$7.5M
$435k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+15%

Still filing today

31%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +25%
  • CC
    CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +60%
  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $116k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2019 · $206k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
    one grant, 2021 · $55k
  • SO
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT
    one grant, 2019 · $52k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
9
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
10
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
11
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ut Southwestern Health Systems; the most unlike its peers is American Trauma Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $902,821 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $683,934 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $492,590 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $486,724 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $459,307 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTONUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $434,864 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKDenver Health and Hospital Authority: $406,968 · OtherDenver Health and Hospital AuthorityUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio: $323,719 · OtherUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $311,864 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $252,831 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $205,928 · OtherUniversity of Alabama: $203,710 · Other+16 more: $812,749 · Other+16 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,312,674 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSIT…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $237,470 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES O…THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $116,009 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF …+2 more: $18,972 · EducationCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $140,032 · HealthMARYLAND MEDICAL LEGAL FOUNDATION INC: $98,160 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical Center: $76,106 · HealthLANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $65,714 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH: $59,727 · HealthINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES: $31,444 · HealthUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS: $29,659 · HealthAMERICAN TRAUMA SOCIETY INC: $18,532 · Health
Other$5,978,009Education$1,685,125Health$519,374

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,312,674 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $237,470 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $140,032 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $116,009 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND MEDICAL LEGAL FOUNDATION INC: $98,160 over 2y, 39% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $76,106 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $65,714 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $59,727 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES: $31,444 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS: $29,659 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN TRAUMA SOCIETY INC: $18,532 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEmory University: $12,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $6,222 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND MEDICAL LEGAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN TRAUMA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…Johns Hopkins Univers…
American Cancer Society IncGA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Johns Hopkins University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coalition for National Trauma Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coalition for National Trauma Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coalition for National Trauma Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home