Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Clover Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$139kEmployment$100kEducation$85kPublic Benefit$17kYouth Development$10kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$4kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$394k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRINCE AVE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$50,000
UGA FOUNDATION$30,000
TURNING POINT USA$13,000
SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS$11,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$10,000
UGA TEE OFF CLUB$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
HOLLY CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
BETHLEHEM CHURCH$1,000
PRAGER U$1,000
GFB FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
INFOCUS$500
CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL$456
CLASSIC CITY CLT CLASSIC$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TURNING POINT USA: $13k → 11%GO FUND ME: $2k → 7%PRAGER U: $3k → 14%PROJECT VERITAS: $2k → 14%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2k → 15%PRINCE AVE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $50k → 6%HOPE HAVEN: $1k → 7%SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS: $31k → 9%NE GA HOMELESS VET SHELTER: $5k → 9%MAGIC CAT ADOPTION NETWORK: $1k → 11%CAMP GLISSON: $7k → 12%HOLLY CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10k → 23%UGA FOUNDATION: $30k → 27%AFP: $3k → 7%PRAGER U: $1k → 14%PROJECT VERITAS: $600 → 14%SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS: $21k → 9%BETHLEHEM CHURCH: $1k → 9%CAMP GLISSON: $6k → 12%THE LIBRE INITIATIVE: $1k → 7%PRAGER U: $600 → 14%CATO INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS: $11k → 9%SHOCK SOFTBALL: $2k → 9%CAMP GLISSON: $6k → 12%UGA: $40k → 27%MAGI-CAT: $3k → 6%SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS: $11k → 9%SHOCK SOFTBALL: $1k → 9%CAMP GLISSON: $6k → 12%CLASSIC CITY CLT CLASSIC: $600 → 27%THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLI: $1k → 14%MAGI-CAT: $2k → 6%SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS: $11k → 9%SHOCK SOFTBALL: $1k → 9%CAMP GLISSON: $2k → 12%MAGI-CAT: $1k → 6%SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS: $10k → 9%SHOCK SOFTBALL: $1k → 9%SANE INC: $1k → 27%MAGI-CAT: $1k → 6%SPECIAL KNEADS & TREATS: $5k → 9%SHOCK SOFTBALL: $1k → 9%TD CLUB OF ATHENS: $120k → 27%MAGI-CAT: $1k → 6%TD CLUB OF ATHENS: $5k → 27%CLARKE COUNTY MENTORS: $1k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
MO
VA
AZ
KS
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$329k · 15 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
20

Total granted

$329k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+22%

Still filing today

40%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SK
    SPECIAL KNEADS AND TREATS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +81%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +36%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • U
    UGA
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • NG
    NE GA HOMELESS VET SHELTER
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • G
    GOFUNDMEORGgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Voteamerica

The mission of voteamerica is to strengthen united states democracy by increasing voter turnout.

Civil Rights
3
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
4
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
7
Usa Football Inc

Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…

Recreation & Sports
8
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
9
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
10
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
11
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
12
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital Research Center and the most unlike its peers is Acc-Sane Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TD CLUB OF ATHENS — $125,000 · OtherTD CLUB OF ATHENSPRINCE AVE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $50,000 · OtherPRINCE AVE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSUGA — $40,000 · OtherUGAIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $26,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTURNING POINT USA INC — $13,250 · Other+27 more — $52,114 · Other+27 moreSPECIAL KNEADS AND TREATS INC — $100,250 · Youth DevelopmentSPECIAL KNEADS AND TREA…+1 more — $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $4,200 · EducationUGA Tee Off Club Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsATHENS RECOVERY WARRIORS INC — $2,635 · HealthACC-SANE Inc — $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $250 · HealthCATO INSTITUTE — $2,800 · Public BenefitGOFUNDMEORG — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $250 · Philanthropy
Other$336,964Youth Development$101,750Education$34,200Recreation & Sports$10,500Health$3,885Public Benefit$2,800Philanthropy$2,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL KNEADS AND TREATS INC — $100,250 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $13,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $4,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATHENS RECOVERY WARRIORS INC — $2,635 over 2y, 17% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $1,609 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACC-SANE Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HAVEN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUE THE VOTE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL KNEADS AND TREATS INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds UGA Tee Off Club Inc
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE
  • Who funds ATHENS RECOVERY WARRIORS INC
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds ACC-SANE Inc
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds Statham Halloween Inc
  • Who funds TRUE THE VOTE INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Clover Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph