· Private foundation
Click Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $123k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BELOVED ASHEVILLE | $60,000 |
| THE SANCTUARY PROJECT | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF PIMA ANIMAL CARE CENTER | $20,000 |
| SPECIAL CARE INC | $20,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAGUNA BEACH | $15,000 |
| TUCSON WILDLIFE CENTER INC | $12,500 |
| SCHOOLPOWER LAGUNA BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $10,800 |
| OCEANA | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO | $10,000 |
| ELEPHANT CLUB DBA ELEPHANT COOPERATION | $5,000 |
| TILLY'S LIFE CENTER | $5,000 |
| OLD SOULS ANIMAL RESCUE & RETIREMENT HOME | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RPREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY4× · 2017–2023 · $300k · revenue +199%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAGUNA BEACH7× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +55%
- FOFriends of Pima Animal Care Center2× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- SCSALPOINTE CATHOLIC EDUC FNDTNone grant, 2020 · $200k
- SMSAN MIGUEL HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $100k
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSSone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.
Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…
Improving health, healing people.
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
Arizona Statewide Independent Living Council, AZSILC is one of 56 Statewide Independent Living Councils, SILCs which are federally mandated under the Rehabilitation Act. There is one SILC in each state and US territory. AZSILC members are…
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Improving health, healing people.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc and the most unlike its peers is Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAGUNA BEACH ↗
- Who funds Friends of Pima Animal Care Center ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
- Who funds LANDMARK COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds ECHOING HOPE RANCH ↗
- Who funds JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc ↗
- Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
- Who funds COYOTE TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · The Ward J and Joy A Timken Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Texas Instruments Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Click Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Landmark College Inc — 1% of income from government
- Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.