Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cle & Dennis Riordan Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$77kHealth$30kReligion$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kFood & Nutrition$19kHousing & Shelter$12kInternational$10kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,891
CHI ST VINCENT FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,270
ARKANSAS LEARNING THRU THE ARTS$500
HOT SPRINGSHOT SPRINGS VILLAGE SYMPHONY GUILD$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SERERA MISSION FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%KONTUM MISSIONARY FRIENDSHIP: $10k → 14%NICK REEDER: $30k → 19%ASPCA: $500 → 17%OPERATION KINDNESS: $500 → 14%JERRY GEROW: $7k → 15%MADELINE BONILLA: $9k → 15%ST VINCENT FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%KARINA BONILLA: $15k → 17%LAURY RAMOS: $4k → 19%WORLD KITCHEN: $5k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH (MID-SOUTH): $1k → 17%SMILE TRAIN: $2k → 17%ASHLEY BONILLAS: $4k → 15%WINTHROP P ROCKEFELLER CANCER INSTI: $5k → 17%MADELINE BONILLA: $8k → 17%LAUREN HART: $25k → 14%ASHLEY BONILLAS: $4k → 15%WINTHROP P ROCKEFELLER CANCER INSTI: $1k → 17%MORGAN COUCH: $5k → 17%ASHLEY BONILLAS: $4k → 15%ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $5k → 17%LEFLER DENTAL: $1k → 17%ASHLEY BONILLAS: $4k → 15%LITTLE ROCK COMPASSION CENTER: $1k → 17%ARKANSAS LEARNINGTHROUGH THE ARTS: $1k → 17%MADELINE BONILLA: $3k → 15%ARKANSAS LEARNINGTHROUGH THE ARTS: $1k → 17%MADELINE BONILLA: $3k → 15%ARKANSAS LEARNING THRU THE ARTS: $500 → 17%MADELINE BONILLA: $3k → 15%LEFLER DENTAL: $479 → 17%ASHLEY BONILLAS: $2k → 15%LEFLER DENTAL: $428 → 17%LEFLER DENTAL: $406 → 17%HOT SPRINGSHOT SPRINGS VILLAGE SYMPHONY GUILD: $250 → 17%LEFLER DENTAL: $245 → 17%JESSIEVILLE ISD: $1k → 17%MOUNTAIN PINE ISD: $1k → 17%FOUNTAIN LAKE ISD: $1k → 17%CHRISTINA WEINGART: $8k → 17%HALL KOPPEL DDS: $6k → 17%HEIDI MANIFOLD: $3k → 17%CHRISTINA WEINGART: $2k → 17%AARON BALDWIN MDM MD: $2k → 17%HEIDI MANIFOLD: $1k → 17%ARKANSAS LEARNING THROUGH THE ARTS: $1k → 17%CHRISTINA WEINGART: $251 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Cle & Dennis Riordan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in AR; by stated purpose, 45%.

Cle & Dennis Riordan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 7 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
28

Total granted

$69k
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+37%

Still filing today

14%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Food & NutritionInternationalHealthAnimalsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2019–2022 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • SM
    SERERA MISSION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feed America First of Tennessee

Feed america first is a murfreesboro, tn based food ministry focused upon hunger relief in small towns and rural communities in middle tn and parts of al, ky and ms. since 2000 faf has distributed enough food for over 150,000,000 meals to…

Food & Nutrition
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
3
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
4
Arkansas Cash for Kindness

To provide assistance to those in need living in the community.

Philanthropy
5
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
6
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
7
Ozarks Food Harvest Inc

Ozarks food harvest's mission is to transform hunger into hope.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
9
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
10
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
11
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
12
Feed Arkansas Kids

Feed arkansas kids is a ministry through the church at rock creek that provides weekend meals for insecure children of central arkansas

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-South Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSERERA MISSION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherSERERA MISSION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,947 · Other+19 more: $59,901 · Other+19 moreKONTUM MISSIONARY AND FRIENDSHIP: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalARKANSAS FOODBANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $5,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT HOPE FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionArkansas Learning Through the Arts: $3,500 · Arts & CultureST VINCENT FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-SOUTH INC: $1,000 · HealthARKANSAS FREEDOM FUND INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESS: $500 · Animals
Other$206,848International$15,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Arts & Culture$3,500Health$3,500Philanthropy$2,500Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetArkansas Learning Through the Arts: $3,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS FREEDOM FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-SOUTH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOT SPRINGS-HOT SPRINGS VILLAGE SYMPHONY GUILD INC: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KONTUM MISSIONARY AND FRIENDSHIP ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Arkansas Learning Through the Arts ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FREEDOM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds HOT SPRINGS-HOT SPRINGS VILLAGE SYMPHONY GUILD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cle & Dennis Riordan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cle & Dennis Riordan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cle & Dennis Riordan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph