Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Claude L Nelson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$39kHealth$26kHousing & Shelter$6kFood & Nutrition$6kEducation$4kInternational$4kReligion$3kArts & Culture$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANDOLPH COUNTY AL DHR$13,500
WEST END COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,400
CIRCLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $1k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $1k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $1k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$81k · 20 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$81k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+110%

Still filing today

60%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHousing & ShelterEmploymentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $6k · revenue +37%
  • CE
    COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +9%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    5× · 2018–2023 · $3k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • BH
    BAKER HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • IC
    INTESTITIAL CYSTITIS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • JF
    JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS
    one grant, 2018 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
5
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
6
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
11
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RANDOLPH COUNTY AL DHR — $25,500 · OtherRANDOLPH COUNTY AL DHRARC OF CALHOUN CLEBURNE COUNTIES — $14,000 · OtherARC OF CALHOUN CLEBURNE COUNTIESCIRCLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherCIRCLE OF LOVE FOUNDATIONLUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY — $4,500 · OtherLUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETYBAKER HIGH SCHOOL — $3,000 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $3,000 · OtherWEST END COMMUNITY CHURCH — $2,400 · Other+13 more — $7,250 · Other+13 moreNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION — $5,750 · Housing & ShelterUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $3,250 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $2,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $200 · InternationalBLUE MONARCH — $4,000 · EmploymentCOMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesFeeding America — $2,500 · Food & NutritionCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $300 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical Center — $250 · HealthNASHVILLE PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $800 · Arts & Culture
Other$64,650Housing & Shelter$5,750International$5,450Employment$4,000Human Services$4,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Health$1,550Arts & Culture$800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION — $5,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE MONARCH — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREW'S-SEWANEE SCHOOL — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds BLUE MONARCH
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds ST ANDREW'S-SEWANEE SCHOOL
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC TELEVISION INC
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Claude L Nelson Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Claude L Nelson Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Claude L Nelson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph