· Private foundation
Claro Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Variety - The Children's Charity So | $12,450 |
| Variety Boys Girls Club | $3,500 |
| Foothill Church School Educ Foundat | $2,500 |
| Reach Beyond | $2,500 |
| Stu and the Kids | $2,000 |
| Cornerstone Church | $1,750 |
| Foothill Church | $1,750 |
| Every One Free | $1,500 |
| Give Something Back - California | $1,000 |
| Historic Italian Hall Foundation | $1,000 |
| Ramona Museum of California History | $560 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.
18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- OFOPTIONS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2024 · $10k · revenue ×11
- TWTHOMAS WHITE JR FOUNDATION INC4× · 2018–2023 · $5k · revenue +694%
- SASTU AND THE KIDS INC3× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- WRWILL ROGERS MOTION PICTURE PIONEERS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +0%
- FIFoundation Internacional Motaone grant, 2021 · $1k
- CPCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF MONROVIAone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Develop programs to help at risk youth
To assit in alternative forms of healthcare and mental health
The primary exempt purpose of and published mission statement is to break the chains of oppression so that people have an opportunity to encounter jesus christ and to live in freedom and to change the world
UTOL is an organization that provides free essential and immediate medical, educational, humanitarian relief assistance to victims of natural disasters and man-made. Our Vision An international self-sustaining medical, educational, and…
We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.
To advance and protect the Black community in the areas of Health, Health Equity, Mental Health, Social Justice, and Substance Abuse.
Choosing Life over Abortion
Help girls with unplanned preg
House of Healing's mission is to provide an educational, psychological, and social support system that will improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, and communities. House of Healing provides services in the areas of…
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OPTIONS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds THOMAS WHITE JR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STU AND THE KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds WILL ROGERS MOTION PICTURE PIONEERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HISTORIC ITALIAN HALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERY ONE FREE ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF MONROVIA ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Claro Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Claro Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Claro Family’s filings →