Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clarkson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Education$1.3MEnvironment$95kHealth$90kInternational$85kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kScience & Tech$50kMembership Benefit$30kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY$60,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$30,000
MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTION$20,000
BAYSIDE CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$20,000
THE LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION$15,000
HAVEN'S RELIEF FUND$10,000
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$10,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NYC$10,000
AMERICAN FIELD SERVICE$10,000
ST PAUL'S SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 22%COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $20k → 7%HAVENS RELIEF FUND SOCIETY: $10k → 17%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 18%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $10k → 14%BAYSIDE CEMETARY ASSOCIATION: $20k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%ST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $5k → 7%THE LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 10%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $10k → 7%HAVENS RELIEF FUND SOCIETY: $10k → 17%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $70k → 18%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $10k → 14%BAYSIDE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%ST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $5k → 7%THE LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $10k → 7%HAVEN'S RELIEF FUND: $10k → 17%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $70k → 18%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $10k → 14%ST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $5k → 7%THE LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $10k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD NYC: $10k → 17%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $60k → 18%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $10k → 14%ST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $5k → 7%THE LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD NYC: $10k → 17%MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTION: $25k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD NYC: $10k → 17%MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTION: $20k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD NYC: $10k → 17%MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTION: $20k → 17%NATURE CONSERVANCY NYC: $5k → 17%MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTION: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FIELD SERVICE: $10k → 17%AFS - AMERICAN FIELD SERVICE: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FIELD SERVICE: $10k → 17%AFS - AMERICAN FIELD SERVICE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 12 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$15k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22
EducationEnvironmentScience & TechHealthMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    4× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +10%
  • LS
    LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $45k · revenue +66%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • HR
    HAVEN'S RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
4
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
8
Clean Reefs
Environment
9
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
10
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
11
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
12
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; the most unlike its peers is The Havens Relief Fund Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $1,300,000 · EducationCLARKSON UNIVERSITY+1 more: $20,000 · EducationMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTION: $85,000 · OtherMIDDLE EAST C…PLANNED PARENTHOOD NYC: $40,000 · OtherPLANNED PAREN…THE HAVENS RELIEF FUND SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherTHE HAVENS RE…AFS - AMERICAN FIELD SERVICE: $20,000 · OtherAFS - AMERICA…AMERICAN FIELD SERVICE: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN FIEL…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · OtherHAVEN'S RELIEF FUND: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherLAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $45,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $50,000 · Science & TechAmerican Association for Cancer Research Foundation: $50,000 · HealthBAYSIDE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Membership Benefit
Education$1,320,000Other$210,000Environment$85,000Science & Tech$50,000Health$50,000Membership Benefit$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $1,300,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Foundation: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $45,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYSIDE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetTHE HAVENS RELIEF FUND SOCIETY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds American Association for Cancer Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYSIDE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HAVENS RELIEF FUND SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clarkson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clarkson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clarkson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph