· Private foundation
Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k25 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEACON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN | $10,000 |
| CANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC | $10,000 |
| MICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION | $10,000 |
| CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING I | $10,000 |
| DISMAS HOUSE OF INDIANA INC | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC | $10,000 |
| INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION | $7,600 |
| KINGDOM LIFE CHRISTIAN CATHEDRAL | $5,000 |
| FAMILY CHILDRENS CENTER | $5,000 |
| LIFE TREATMENT CENTERS INC | $5,000 |
| REINS OF LIFE INC | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S DISPENSARY AND HOSPITAL INC | $5,000 |
| ENSEMBLE CONCEPT21 INC | $5,000 |
| OHANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHEROES CAMP INC4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +13%
- LCLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC6× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +155%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC3× · 2018–2022 · $55k · revenue +778%
Funded once
- VPVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue ×15
- SBSOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +18%
- CNCROSSING NATIONAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
We, saint joseph regional medical center (sjrmc) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sjrmc is a member of trinity health.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Joseph County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dismas House of Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEROES CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES ↗
- Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds Beacon Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE TREATMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEAR NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC ↗
- Who funds O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSING NATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Merrimans Playhouse Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Logan Community Resources Inc ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BEND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Beacon Health System Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC ↗
- Who funds THE LGBTQ CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MUSICAL ARTS INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds DISMAS HOUSE OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn · Fields Foundation Irr Tua · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · American Electric Power Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Alliance Inc — 20% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.