Skip to content
Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua at a glance

· Private foundation

Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$315kHuman Services$276kYouth Development$256kArts & Culture$100kHousing & Shelter$69kEducation$67kCommunity Improvement$65kFood & Nutrition$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC$10,000
DISMAS HOUSE OF INDIANA INC$10,000
MICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN$10,000
BEACON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
CANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC$10,000
CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING I$10,000
INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION$7,600
KINGDOM LIFE CHRISTIAN CATHEDRAL$5,000
CORVILLA INC$5,000
ENSEMBLE CONCEPT21 INC$5,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA$5,000
CHILDREN'S DISPENSARY AND HOSPITAL INC$5,000
LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS NAT'L HEADQUARTERS: $15k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $4k → 15%INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 16%INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 16%INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 16%INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION: $7k → 16%INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%SCAN INC: $5k → 12%SCAN INC: $5k → 12%THE LGBTQ CENTER INC: $10k → 13%THE UPPER ROOM RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC: $3k → 13%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $20k → 13%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $20k → 13%CORVILLA INC: $5k → 13%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$965k · 30 repeat orgs$323k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
25

Total granted

$965k
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+19%

Still filing today

80%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HEROES CAMP INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +13%
  • LC
    LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +155%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $55k · revenue +778%

Funded once

  • VP
    VENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue ×15
  • SB
    SOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • CN
    CROSSING NATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
5
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center Inc

We, saint joseph regional medical center (sjrmc) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sjrmc is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
12
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Joseph County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dismas House of Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
35/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY KROC CENTER OF: $101,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY KROC CENTER OFLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $69,000 · OtherLA CASA DE AMISTAD INCTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $53,900 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INCCANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES: $52,000 · OtherCANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVIC…REINS OF LIFE INC: $47,000 · OtherREINS OF LIFE INCNEAR NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $30,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH: $25,000 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA: $25,000 · OtherVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $25,325 · Other+24 more: $210,545 · Other+24 moreBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $45,000 · HealthBeacon Health …LIFE TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $41,500 · HealthLIFE TREATMENT…O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthO'HANA HERITAG…CHILDREN'S HOPE INC: $18,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOP…FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $17,500 · HealthFAMILY AND CHI…Beacon Health System Inc: $10,000 · HealthBeacon Health …+2 more: $7,500 · HealthHEROES CAMP INC: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEROES CAMP I…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $54,602 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRL…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS O…FIVE STAR LIFE INC: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $43,700 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVI…INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC: $42,400 · Human ServicesINDIANA WOM…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesIRIS FAMILY…THE LGBTQ CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE LGBTQ C…CORVILLA INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $6,200 · Human ServicesMerrimans Playhouse Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH BEND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL ARTS INDIANA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH BEND YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $45,000 · EmploymentALLIANCE INC: $11,300 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MICHIANA INC: $9,000 · EmploymentCROSSING NATIONAL INC: $20,000 · EducationGOOD SHEPHERD MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationKENNEDY PRIMARY ACADEMY PTO INC: $4,000 · Education
Other$664,270Health$165,000Youth Development$152,102Human Services$132,300Arts & Culture$67,500Employment$65,300Education$42,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEROES CAMP INC: $80,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $69,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $54,602 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $53,900 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES: $52,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC: $47,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $43,700 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetINDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC: $42,400 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetLIFE TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $41,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEAR NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $25,325 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA: $25,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCROSSING NATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE INC: $18,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $17,500 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE INC: $11,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeacon Health System Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDISMAS HOUSE OF INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMUSICAL ARTS INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetTHE LGBTQ CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetUnity Gardens: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MICHIANA INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS: $7,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFIVE STAR LIFE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHIRLEY HEINZE LAND TRUST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOSIERS FEEDING THE HUNGRY INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BEACON RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHAROLD W MCMILLEN CENTER FOR HEALTH EDUCATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPPER ROOM RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Muessel Ellison Mem I…Carroll F V Char Tr-M…Community Foundation …Judd Leighton Foundat…Klockow Harvey R and …Fields Foundation Irr…1st Source Bank Found…University of Notre D…Community Foundation …United Way of St Jose…The Pokagon Fund IncAmerican Electric Pow…
Muessel Ellison Mem Irr TuaMO72.8× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn · Fields Foundation Irr Tua · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · American Electric Power Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Alliance Inc: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home